Im not sure why having it live helps at all,the film festival interview was total car crash telly, claudia was squinting at the autocue connected to a different camera all the time, and it didnt need to be done like that at all
so its sole live purpose it seems can only be to read out tweets during the show as thankfully there arent film festivals (oh and btw most the festival films you recommended were the show premieres which sold out weeks ago) every week (agh but what about premieres), so great, thanks for that bbc, we feel so interactive now
the debating aspect, well yes but Kermode and Mayo do it much better, as did Siskel & Ebert once so its not like a new concept and it kind of works better if you dont have the same opinions on the films but hey does debating whether a 4 or 5 year old might like a film at 23:15 at night really purport to be the height of film debate now, reminRAB of when Newsnight review reviewed Cats and Dogs for some reason and Germaine Greer was explaining how she just could bring herself to believe the acting performance of the talking cat.
ultimately all I as a film goer want from this kind of show is to know which films are out this week, which films am I likely to enjoy the most by paying to go see, and which films in the pipeline might be of some interest, perhaps with a bit of lets explain the film making process tacked on.
I dont want a lifestyle film show, I dont need a meme of top 5 films connected tenuously via some utterly random link, or multiple presenters (seriously why mention that Pixar thing its like Im so hip Im counter culture odd thing to say) or people like Simon Pegg telling us what films they like.
frankly I survived best part of a decade after Ross took it on without watching it, and my first impression is actually his show was still better than this for all its faults. so I think Ill happily continue to avoid it.
stono