Just talking about bolt-in cams... no increase in compression, displacement, or head work:
As far as the SE cams, I'd consider either the 204 or 255. With the 211, you'd be giving up performance in the lower rpm range. Really, the 211 needs more compression to work well. Lots of guys love the 204. It works pretty well in the low end, and rocks in the mid-upper range. It also has the benefit of a great sounding idle. It's probably about comparable to the stock cam until around 2500 rpms, then it would take off. The 255 is a favorite of touring bike owners because it shines in the rpm range most of us ride... 1800 to about 4000.
I haven't worked with the Andrews cams, but there's lots of guys here that have. Just looking at the timing events, the 26 looks similar to the 204, but with a little less lift, duration, and overlap. It would probably come on a little earlier than the SE204, and the 204 would probably hold on a little longer. That's just an educated guess, not based on actual experiencee.
Really, for anyone to advise you on cams, you need to identify what rpm band you tend to ride in, and what you're wanting to accomplish. Do tend to ride at 3000 plus rpm, and like to bounce off the rev limiter? Do you want stop light to stop light performance? Do you tour 2-up, fully loaded? What I like might not be what you like.