For English class I am arguing the positive side of human genetic engineering (don't lecture me the topic and side was chosen by my teacher). While researching I found an argument that I can't seem to shake off. If we decide to allow human genetic enhancement then what about test subjects, or what if something goes wrong and a test subject is deformed in someway by the experiment. How can we justify human test subjects? If my opponent brings this argument up I'm not sure how I can answer.
If you have any other ideas, opinions, or interesting articles on the subject of human genetic engineering feel free to post them.
Thank you.
Camp I see what your saying, but I feel the need to mention that the "test subjects" would be newborn children with their whole life ahead of them. My only issue is that it will be difficult in the debat to be cold and factual about children. But really thanks if it comes down to it I think your point will prove useful.
If you have any other ideas, opinions, or interesting articles on the subject of human genetic engineering feel free to post them.
Thank you.
Camp I see what your saying, but I feel the need to mention that the "test subjects" would be newborn children with their whole life ahead of them. My only issue is that it will be difficult in the debat to be cold and factual about children. But really thanks if it comes down to it I think your point will prove useful.