You are not getting what I am trying to say. The pressure kick all the way down to the platform collapsing..... these are things we plan for and do TONS of modeling, so we know how to optimize the situation and make sure we have the most efficient plan to stop the issue. The problem is, when we model, it is all based off of ASSUMPTIONS. EVERYTHING is assumptions. When the real deal happens, specifically since something of this size has NEVER happened, it is hard to execute it perfectly and get good results. This is basically a first of it's kind.
Shell and BP are VERY good companies when it comes to safety and not polluting. I am sure things were dated on the rig but everything as far as we know to the collapse was still in working order. One thing failed, which caused another failure, which caused ANOTHER failure. The problem was that the size of the disaster almost seemed out of the engineering range given the size of the blowout.
It happens. It is an accident and now we can only improve our techniques to make it all better.
End of story.