L
Lady "L"
Guest
Ok, first and foremost, let me just tell everyone I'm a fundamentalist Christian--say what you will, lol--anyway, I believe that everything--yes everything in the bible is truth. I also believe that God is the creator of the earth, and all things in it. Now, I've been studying evolution lately--just so I could further understand it. What if I believed that God created every kind of animal in the days that it says He did--however, it says that God created every bird, according to its kind--etc., etc. I believe that there was a dominate species of every kind of animal in the beginning--and each species evolved over time into branching species. meaning--for instance--that there was one big cat in the beginning, and eventually it gave us our tigers--so on and so fourth. when the bible says God created every living thing according to its 'Kind', maybe it's kind was kinda like what we would consider 'genus' in the taxonomy structure. It's obvious that species change, but it's not obvious that the genus changes. This would do away with the obvious missing link problem--(although most evolutionists say that that's not really an issue)--this would also get rid of the problem that Noah's ark couldn't possibly hold all the animals in the world--because there would obviously be a smaller amount of species on the planet. This would also be consistant with what the bible teaches that God made all animals--because by creating the DNA of every 'kind' of species--every animal's blue prints were created. Think on this--the bible states that God created every plant, tree, etc, according to it's kind, BUT, in Genesis 2:5-6
5Now no shrub of the field was yet in the earth, and no plant of the field had yet sprouted, for the LORD God had not sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man to cultivate the ground.
6But a mist used to rise from the earth and water the whole surface of the ground.
This indicates that God created everything---BUT, everything had not come to fruition yet--it was still in its basest form--and needed time to grow--which would go along with my theory that God didn't create everything in it's fullest form just yet--but only in it's primary state.
Now, this is only my theory--and I welcome any amount of corrective critism from believers and non-believers, alike. PLEASE set me straight if you see any ignorance in my theory. THANKS!
5Now no shrub of the field was yet in the earth, and no plant of the field had yet sprouted, for the LORD God had not sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man to cultivate the ground.
6But a mist used to rise from the earth and water the whole surface of the ground.
This indicates that God created everything---BUT, everything had not come to fruition yet--it was still in its basest form--and needed time to grow--which would go along with my theory that God didn't create everything in it's fullest form just yet--but only in it's primary state.
Now, this is only my theory--and I welcome any amount of corrective critism from believers and non-believers, alike. PLEASE set me straight if you see any ignorance in my theory. THANKS!