Are you "American"

No, I'm saying it is confusing if you just see a date written as say 5/11/04 on the web. If I saw it in everyday life, I'd take it to be 5th November. If it's on the web, I have to stop and think: is it an American who wrote this? Have I got to reverse the day and month or not?

But since you find it so easy, you won't mind me using the numeric format I'm used to, for you will remember to convert 12/1/02 to 1/12/02 won't you? :rolleyes:
 
I am a US citizen but not that far removed from Canada as grandparents on both side were from Quebec.

And I love Eurotrash. Spent 2 years in Germany and have made several long trips to France, Belgium and the NetherlanRAB. UK is on my "to do" list.

Also, I should mention that US Army uses the European method of dates as well but usually write out the month. So it is 14 Jul 2005.
 
Why does it matter?

We have obviously seen people from other countries that hold a knowledge that far surpasses the knowledge many Americans here have of their own country to several degrees.

The claim that if you are not ____ you don't understand is stupid. As if place of origin was a fundemental factor as to your knowledge. Such arguments would dictate that if you were not from Asia, you don't understand, and therefore someone who has spent 5 decades studying Asia but was not born there did not know much about it.

Quite stupid to say the very least.

Education is avaliable to all, merely because you are too lazy to undertake it does not mean someone that is not American has not undergone the effort to become more informed and educated then you.
 
Yes, there was abuse at Gitmo and Afghanistan, but lets not forget that it was perpetuated by a tiny percentage of US soldiers. Lets not forget that the vast majority of US soldiers (about 99%) did not abuse prisoners.

So yes lets condemm the abuse and bring those responsible to court and punish them , but don't brush the entire US army with this charge.
 
Yes, this is all true and what is also true is that there were industrial plants in Dresden making parts for the german military. You have quoted DW, and given a german perspective.

The german perspective usually ignores the military reasons for bombing Dresden (only slightly alludes to it in this article by saying the allies were trying to cut the lines of communication to the front).

So the germans dwell on the civilian casualties and ignore the fact that Dresden was chosen because there were factories making military componets for Hilter's war machine.

But to be objective you have to give two sides of the story . My point is the german perspective only gives one side of the story - this piece in DW is a good example.
 
As I recall citizenship is granted on several basis

1) be born on American territory (not sure how embassies work)
2) be born on a American base
3) be born to at least one American parent
4) be naturalized
5) serve under the military's new program which grants it
6) gain it through legislation such as the 10 year

Usually the US requires you to ditch one, and often people ditch one due to tax purposes. Who wants to pay taxes to two or more countries?

The highest number I recall was of a kid born on a US base in French Morocco. Got 3 citizenships.

VOR's argument is similar to the one used for illegal jailing of 100,000 Japanese. Quite sad to say the least. History is one of the two greatest teachers you will ever have. Quite a pity to say that many people reject such teachings.
 
Missed this thread at first. I was born in the US to British parents, then moved back to Blighty at 2. I registered to vote in the US at 18, so have dual citizenship.

For VoR's information, I have never taken the Oath of Allegiance, nor would I. Were we to go to war, I'd be behind the UK totally. Personally I'd happily renounce my US citizenship if it wasn't for the fact that getting rid of that imbecile in the White House (or whatever replaces him) is an international matter, and using my vote to try and do that is in the intrest of both our countries.

And as to what I consider myself? British first and foremost, English second and I suppose European a distant third and American at a very distant fourth.
 
Actually we flattened a city by 'accident' so they would stop trying to destroy our airbases. Its a fairly shady incident where no one seems to know whether it was really intentional or not.

We bombed civilians first, and it was this outrage from Hitler that brought the blitz - escalation of atrocities that ment that we were saved from losing the one or two air bases, which without them we would have surrendered.
 
I was just watching a CNN documentary last night about how the French having been dealing with terrorism. The french have been locking people up for years with no trial. Several of them released years later after they were found to be innocent.

The french judges who have been given extra powers to deal with terrorism use those powers liberally in every sense of the word. Their view is ' better safe than sorry'. When it comes to locking up people for years with no trial , the french take the cake for it. The french judge even said that lf innocent people get caught , thats the price to pay for preventing terrorist attacks on FRENCH SOIL.

So you see my point when it is your country that is under attack , you will use whatever it takes.

So how come the euro press which has been so gleefully reporting on US tactics never reported on what the french are doing ?
 
Nope, that's not the case. My father was born of American parents while they were in French Indo China, which is now Vietnam. He was both a US and French citizen automatically.
 
Originally Posted by JPSartre12
Come now, VoR. Everyone knows that the French would never fight another country.....by themselves.





Maybe a refresher course in verbs is in order. The word "would" is a third sigular PRESENT TENSE verb. It denotes possible current events, not the past. What France did 300 years ago is irrelevent...unless you have your own time machine. :rolleyes:
 
I think there's a thread about that incident here, mae, that's been beat to death already. There's no use in trying to make people see that it was just a few soldiers that screwed up - they'll just scream that it's typical of all.
 
Hmmmm so how is it when a person becomes a citizen of the U.S. the first thing he or she does is say the Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S.?
 
Back
Top