20 potatos a day for 60 days!!

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Aussie wrote:


Now the fellow doing this was very biased. There are better before and
after markers that could have been measured. Most importantly CRP and
homocysteine. And only the total cholesterol number is shown. No doubt his
good HDL went down, and the composition of the LDL shifted more to bad
small dense from good large bouyant.

If you want to show that a potato only diet is healthy, it is easy to fudge
the results.

Don (e-mail at page bottom).
 
Don Wiss wrote in
news:[email protected]:



And unless you do it and come up with a different set of figures to back up
your suppositions, all you're doing is blowing hot air.



--
Peter Lucas
Hobart
Tasmania

The act of feeding someone is an act of beauty,
whether it's a full Sunday roast or a jam sandwich,
but only when done with love.
 
In article ,
Sqwertz wrote:



[snipped bullshit, although it's partly correct]


Look at my numbers above. Also look at my cite.

It may not be 5:1, but it's certainly not the 1:1 that Marty seemed to
be claiming.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
 
"Brooklyn1" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

There used to be a restaurant in Seattle that had oven baked chips on their
menu. Don't know if they are still there or not of if they are, if they
still offer them. They used huge Russet potatoes and the chips were thick.
These are what I made at home.
 
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 19:03:58 -0800, "Julie Bove"
wrote:


I often make those crisp and puffy delights at home but no way do I
consider those oven roasted potatoes chips. However even those don't
result in very much from a five pound bag of spuds, I'd consider the
results 4 servings... they are less oily and salty than commercial
potato chips, most folks can really put them away.
 
Typical low IQ texass newbie still hasn't figured out that anything
posted to usenet is tawkin' to the whole fucking woild... what a dumb
POS shit you are, dwarf... you and your sock nunya nonutz, etal. Yoose
phoney sock motherfuckers don't exist to me.
 
Dan Abel wrote:

I didn't give any numbers, ratios, or claim zero loss. So I forgot about the
water weight, BFD. You're now grossly exaggerating my post.

When I said the waste was minimal, the fact is you still end up with a hell
of a lot to eat out of one potato. From the standpoint of perception rather
than measurement, there doesn't seem to be much waste when you get so much
from so little. To some extent water is replaced with fat. But for the most
part, if you're not talking about water, and rather talking about the part
of the potato which has food and nutritional value, there is indeed very
little loss. Screw the numbers. I know what I get out of one thinly sliced
potato in the fryer.

MartyB
 
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:10:20 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:


I'm fine with that, but when you direct a post at one specific
person telling them their full of shit (me talking to you), I don't
expect somebody else to think I was talking to them.


Yep. I am Marty's sock puppet. I hope nobody from AFF-F finds
out!

-sw
 
Sqwertz wrote:

Some folks like chicarones some don't. I have found them quite variable
in quality. Are there brands that are consistantly puffy, crunchy and
mild flavored?
 
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:42:48 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger wrote:


Most of them are. There's two different kinds - with and without
skin. The without are just pork fat pieces rendered of most of
their fat with only the solids left behind. These are always mild
and fluffy (not taking into account any seasonings).

The ones with skin can vary wildly, even within the same package.
Most require some jaw action, and some require teeth made of
diamonds. The hardest one you can buy commercially (possibly the
hardest food on the planet) are Tom's Pork Skin Strips:

http://toms-snacks.com/our-snacks/pork-skins/red-pepper-cracklin-strips/
(The actual contents pictured are not what are depicted).

Avoid those. They are 4x harder than corn nuts. The rest of the
lineup are pretty good and consistent, though.

-sw
 
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:53:48 -0500, blake murphy
wrote:


Look who the fuck is talking hosiery... you legless-worthless dumb
bitch... you're one of Jargon Scott's legless dogs.

"Jargon constantly tries to explain the benefits of owning legless
dogs, such as: they never run away, you never have to walk them,
they're safe around children, etc."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sifl_and_Olly_Show

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .
 
Sqwertz wrote:

Two posters have now posted ones to avoid.

I've found that the least variable fried pork skins are the ones with
the heavy chemical flavoring. Red chemical dust on good crunchy mild
skins. A strange experience.
 
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:16:17 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger wrote:


And make sure you have a glass of water handy. They have a
tendency to stick in your throat and choke you if your mouth is too
dry.

-sw
 
Sqwertz wrote:


I had drinks recently at this really nice bar in Charleston where one of
the bar snacks available were "beer & cheddar pork rinds". Never being a
pork rind eater we ordered them to try. Nooooooot bad at all! Of course
they were freshly made and still warm which helps. They went so well
with the drinks and the drinks were wonderfully well prepared and tasty.
(I was drinking gin & tonics)
It was interesting that this very trendy place had some unusual (good!)
snacks-
http://www.mccradysrestaurant.com/pilotFiles/menusDocs/files/11.19.10Bar Snack.pdf
 
Back
Top