Search results

As the British would say: I refer you to my previous answer. No crime if zero alcohol. And BTW: I actually understood the joke was not intended for the police, but your concern was the outside chance of being pulled over by the cops.

You seem to have a colorful and creative source for history and science. This is probably why everyone considers you nutty, even your family.

Why would it be illegal. Parents are just that and guardians of the minor child. Now, for older teens, it may be more difficult if they're resistant, but tests authorized by parents are lawful.

Hoax deniers are still try and refute the 11 years of steady cooling.

Inside is the Exploratorium. Open everyday.

Because he doesn't control them, they aren't sycophants like the other networks.

Obama is scared of actual tough questions. He'd have to wear Depends if ever to appear on FOX or in front of an actual journalist doing his job. ABC's pathetic puff propaganda piece next week is shameful.

I'd call the cable company and demand your right to be informed of the truth. Katie Couric surely won't tell you.

Al Gore tried his best to steal an election, but couldn't Bush won the election, won every recount, won re-election. Sorry!

What the hell are you talking about? Fox has never been conservative and always been moderate, they just actually present both sides fairly, and is still doing so, which in comparison to the MSM seems conservative. You must be watching a diffrent Fox network. BTW: Libertarians and moderates are...

If you can show the police or prosecution was deliberately in error, hiding exculpatory evidence, or somehow knew you were truly innocent, but still pursued the arrest or conviction...then yes, you may be entitled to compensation for prosecutorial or police misconduct. Other than that, the...

Letterman was NOT referring to Bristol, she wasn't on the trip. Only Willow was at the ballgame, and only Willow was singled out for rape by a ballplayer. You are the manipulated one, and the sad part is you are clueless to your own ignorance. You know what confirms your clulessness? You...

It's media arrogance, believing their calls are worthy of immediate response. It's a way to manipulate their audience into believing they exhausted all attempts to contact the party in question, when in reality, it was probably a single voice message left in a mailbox somewhere. It's also a way...