when the major scientific concensus is that it absolutely does.
Read it and weep, baby. Read it and weep for your wrongness on this one.
U.S. Department of Transportation,"This program of research has shown that marijuana, when taken alone, produces a moderate degree of driving impairment which is related to the consumed THC dose. The impairment manifests itself mainly in the ability to maintain a steady lateral position on the road, but its magnitude is not exceptional in comparison with changes produced by many medicinal drugs and alcohol. Drivers under the influence of marijuana retain insight in their performance and will compensate, where they can, for example, by slowing down or increasing effort. As a consequence, THC's adverse effects on driving performance appear relatively small."
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(DOT HS 808 078), Final Report, November 1993:
Okay, that was from '93, but I can't see a lot changing between then and now.
That quote isn't nearly the knockout blow you appear to think it is.

It does accord with my (admittedly subjective) observations - that being light-to-moderately stoned isn't as dangerous as being the same amount of drunk, because generally the light-to-moderately stoned tend to compensate for the impairment.
That, however, acknowledges that there *is* a degree of 'impairment', of course.
There comes a point, as anyone who has smoked a lot of weed ought to know, where one is simply too stoned to 'compensate' any more. Hell, I've been too stoned to walk to the door, let alone drive!
