xOk1ssm3throughth3phon3xO
New member
A friend sent me this link and after watching this video i relized this isnt to far off from ACTAULLY happening. http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/epic
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Wow, watch this guys its really scary.
- Thread starter xOk1ssm3throughth3phon3xO
- Start date
jennifer_dozer
New member
i didnt really get it?? lol so what if all that happens? is that like bad or something?
CZAR LOGAN THE GREAT
New member
i'm alittle lost... i don't really see the big deal..
xMeTAlxChICkx
New member
ok so i wasent the only one lol can someone explain?
Stephanie C
New member
so google and microsoft will own the internet. oh well. lol.
i like both
i think what that video was predicting would be kinda cool. well some parts
i like both
i think what that video was predicting would be kinda cool. well some parts
corpsefingers
New member
I think what they have right is the relevance of social contribution to everyday data and news aggregation services.
I think what they have WRONG is that the social contribution will trump the corporate aggregator.
Social news-gathering sources may be ultimately reliable from a granular perspective, but not by any means reputable: Yeah, you can trust your frienRAB on the network to disseminate issues concerning things like current events, but this is attributed to nothing more than "eyewitness" accounts of what's going on in their corner of the world. But you wouldn't trust those same sources to have the same ethos and quality control standarRAB of corporate news sources. Even though ironically we all sort of suspect corporate news of their inherent proclivity to "spin" information on us. But at least we have the choice of cross-referencing these sources to affect some margin of common, relative truth.
I think what they have WRONG is that the social contribution will trump the corporate aggregator.
Social news-gathering sources may be ultimately reliable from a granular perspective, but not by any means reputable: Yeah, you can trust your frienRAB on the network to disseminate issues concerning things like current events, but this is attributed to nothing more than "eyewitness" accounts of what's going on in their corner of the world. But you wouldn't trust those same sources to have the same ethos and quality control standarRAB of corporate news sources. Even though ironically we all sort of suspect corporate news of their inherent proclivity to "spin" information on us. But at least we have the choice of cross-referencing these sources to affect some margin of common, relative truth.