...of bias in a news story? Please note, I said NEWS STORY, not commentary. If you mention the names O'Reilly, Hannity, Beck, etc...it simply proves that you are incapable of differentiating news and comment.
mr: I put in the caveat because it's common sense. Commentators are SUPPOSED to have a POV. It's their reason for being.
slightly: You just proved that you don't grasp the concept of commentary. A commentator doesn't have the same responsibility to be non-partisan that a journalist does, but that doesn't mean they're not correct. If O'Reilly or one of the others makes a point and backs it up with facts, why SHOULDN'T others use those facts to make an argument? Just because the DailyKos or Keith Olberman are full of you-know-what 99% of the time doesn't mean they can't occasionally come up with a legitimate fact or two.
saint: Congratualtions on making my point for me. I looked at your first link, and the first dozen or so entries listed are all about commentators.
Dismissed.
mr: I put in the caveat because it's common sense. Commentators are SUPPOSED to have a POV. It's their reason for being.
slightly: You just proved that you don't grasp the concept of commentary. A commentator doesn't have the same responsibility to be non-partisan that a journalist does, but that doesn't mean they're not correct. If O'Reilly or one of the others makes a point and backs it up with facts, why SHOULDN'T others use those facts to make an argument? Just because the DailyKos or Keith Olberman are full of you-know-what 99% of the time doesn't mean they can't occasionally come up with a legitimate fact or two.
saint: Congratualtions on making my point for me. I looked at your first link, and the first dozen or so entries listed are all about commentators.
Dismissed.