would gordon brown do a better job if he didnt have to answer to the media and...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr inventor
  • Start date Start date
M

Mr inventor

Guest
...oposition everyday? surely if peole let him get on with his job he would be better at it?
if i spent 50% of my day worrying about what people think and 45% arguing with the linch mobs i dont think i'd get much done. why dont they let him get on with the job hes elected to do. then if he doesnt come up with the goods then vote for someone else
we dont live in a democracy really. you just vote for who you think is best after listening to them tell you what you want to hear and then they do what they want when theyre in power anyway. of course you need to debate things but surely you have to let the man at the top just get on with it? how manuy hours a day does he actually spend on what he should be spending time on?
its ok for the oposition to criticise everyday but they dont have to worry about running the country?
if he doesnt come up with the goods then vote him out but you cant vote someone in and then not let him get on with it. he wouldnt be a dictator because hes answerable to the electorate at the end of the day. maybe the mps should do there jobs and give him the feedback and let him get on with his job. they dont listen anyway so why bother wasting his time? if he fucks it up then sack him. simple.
of course you cant get rid of the media???
 
He wasn't elected ...that's the whole point ,even his own party don't want him. As for pressure from the press. why not? he is in charge of this country and should be answerable to everyone!
 
Back
Top