Worst Film Ever - Cast your worst film into a pit of flames here

Godzilla- the incredible growing & shrinking monster. All the little Zillas slipping on balls as they came around a corner!!!!!

Showgirls- I seen more erotic fish. Special shout out to that bit when they were having sex in the pool & she looked like she was being attacked by a crocodile.

Titanic- In the name of God just drowned already!
 
adams family (only saw first 55minutes then walked out never done that before)
heat (went on and on and on)
die another day ( i love all james bond films but this was pathetic)
 
I saw it on tv the other week it was shit. Is it only me who thinks that Clooney looks like a thunderbird muppet sorry puppet. In Solaris his face looked like one who flies thunderbird one or is it two, I dont know but he is definitely a relation to them.
 
Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon looks seriously mis-placed on your list there. I can see how you would say the others but com'on, CTHD one of the worst movies ever... how can anyone lump it together with the likes of Catwoman and Wolf Creek?
 
Yep I agree. Since when did a film adapted from a book have to follow the book exactly? Screenwriters take the book and use the bits they want to and discard the bits they don't. Some parts of novels are inherently uncinematic while other parts that a novelist might skip over can become great movie scenes. Frankly I'm glad they cut out the bit in the The Shining novel where the kid is attacked by a hose-pipe and the father is attacked by some bushes! Anyway Stephen King's novels are usually way too long in my opinion so you got to cut out some of his waffle.

Nowadays when they adapt well-known books they tend to stick slavishly to the book which often acts to the detriment of the film. Off the top of my head I can think of the third Harry Potter film and Hannibal (killer pigs? No thanks!)
 
Hullo there!!!

Well so far on this thread there has been 216 films mentioned in the negative*. Yes that's right, I have no life.

Here for your delectation is the list of those scoring more than 2 votes - the worst of the worst:

Van Helsing 6 votes
Catwoman 5 votes
Open Water 5 votes
Titanic 5 votes
Batman & Robin 4 votes
Avengers 3 votes
Blair Witch Project 3 votes
Blair Witch 2 3 votes
CrossroaRAB 3 votes
Fear Dot Com 3 votes
Forrest Gump 3 votes
Grease 2 3 votes
Mr & Mrs Smith 3 votes
Solaris 3 votes
Star Wars 1 3 votes
Star Wars 3 3 votes
Village 3 votes

Honourable mentions for any film featuring an actor/director go to:

Brigitte Nielsen
Jean Claude Van Damme
Madonna
Michael Winner
Quentin Tarentino
Steven Seagal
Terry Gilliam



If you want the full list just pm me for it.

* - I've not included anyone who walked out on a film or say they don't like it but have never seen it.
 
:eek:

Pharoah, it's a difficult one and as I said on my previous post we are not going to agree, because in your opinion, the film is the masterpiece and in my opinion the book is.

The scenes that terrified you, infuriated me because they were inventions by the Director/scriptwriter/whatever, they were not from the pen of the author.

Your comment on Kubrick making the story more believable is not relevant because the book was an unbelievable story and that is what made it so sensational. :)

I agree with your opinion that "today" the topiary animals wouldn't work well at all in a film, but twenty or so years ago, they would've been terrifying. :eek:

As to your "psychological" angle, the point was that Danny's 'shine' was bringing the spirits to life and making them solid and real.

I promise to look at the film again, should it be on the TV, but I honestly don't think my opinion will change. :rolleyes:

It's simple really, I feel exactly about the book as you do about the film and so we are in a Catch 22 situation. :cool:

Now there's another film I cannot comment on. :D :eek:
 
You're quite right pharoah, I did expect the film to be the same as the book and I don't think that was an unfair expectation either! Unlike you, I feel that the film should be a fair adaptation of the book and I really don't look for any 'new' ideas from Directors'. I believe that the Author and Director each know their own craft and should not meddle to much in each others'. :(

I was really disappointed with the fact that;

Instead of the moving animal topiary, we got the maze. Because if there was ever a chance for a Director to terrify his audience and bring something 'new' onto the cinema screens at that time, there was a missed opportunity. :confused:

The woman in the bath was turned into a very beautiful younger woman for audience titillation, I assume. The part in the book, where she is described as being fat, bloated and purple and with evil intent was completely overlooked.
Another opportunity was lost here when Danny had reached the door and was counting to 10, as Halloran had told him to do and when he turned around, she was right behind him. That was a terrifying image in the book and I'd love to have seen that translated into film. :eek:

Danny, whose character in the book was depicted as a quietly intelligent little boy was portrayed as slightly moronic in the film. :confused:

To be fair to Shelley Duvall, physically she was the complete opposite of the picture I had in my mind of Wendy from the book. Wendy was strong and determined to protect her son even though it meant the end of her relationship with her husband. Sorry to repeat myself, but all I can remember Shelley Duvall doing was running around and screaming. :o

There are a lot of other things that irritated me about Kubrick's version of 'The Shining', but I won't go on and on.

Don't get the wrong idea, I am not a Jack Nicholson hater, I loved him in 'one flew over the Cuckoo's nest', but I still think his portrayal of Jack was wrong for 'The Shining.' :(

I'm sorry we won't agree on this and I haven't meant to offend you in any way with regard to the film. You are entitled to have it as one of your favourite films as I am equally entitled to say that in my opinion it was the worst film I ever saw. Again you are right when you say it was my biggest disappointment ever, it was and for all the reasons I have listed above! :)

At least we agree about Stephen King's books and he is a fantastic writer. When I read 'The Shining', I was stunned and envious and just wished that I had written that book. ;) :D
 
Not sure actually to be honest. I don't think so though because i would probably be more inclined to remember if there were well known actors in it..i don't remember recognizing any of them and it did seem like a bit of a budget film.
 
:(

I know it's not the greatest film ever, but I must admit to being a tad envious of that young scout who Amanda Donohoe takes into her bath. What a way to go!

These may not be the worst films ever, but to my tiny mind, they're way overrated:

Lock, Stock And Two Smoking Barrels (Am I the only person in the world that hates this film?)

Don't Look Now (A title that should be taken literally in this case)

The Exorcist (No wonder it was banned on video for all those years: it's crap!)

The Village (Every. Word. In. The. Script. Has. A. Full. Stop. After. It. What were Willam Hurt and Sigourney Weaver thinking when they signed up for this pretentious bilge?)
 
One film I thought was particularly bad - especially taking into consideration its budget - was Equilibrium. Boring, boring, boring. And the face-cutting-off scene was badly done!

Another was The Perfect Storm. Drowning might actually be preferable...
 
Brokeback mountain. Loathe it....hate it....what more can I say?!!

For me cowboy and western is stuff with Clint Eastwood or John Wayne.....its about shooting....not bumming for goodness sake :eek:
 
Anything starring Jean Claude Van Damme, Steven Segal, Brigitte Nielsen obviously qualifies without further thought.

Quentin Tarantino - smacks of "the emperor's new clothes" to me. Can't say I've particularly liked any of his films.

My all time 'favourite' worst film though has to be "Forrest Gump". Utter tripe of the highest order. Sickeningly patronising, simpering, utter tosh.
 
Back
Top