Scientific consensus collusion on global warming
You won't be seeing this much in the MSM:
It’s a story that broke first in Europe, but is making its way here. (I heard about it on NewsFifty, which is constantly adding links.) Here’s the story, briefly: Hadley GRU is one of the major climate change advocacy organizations. Hackers broke into its database and discovered more than a thousand emails and documents indicating that scientists were colluding with the organization to push the “man made global warming” mantra — irrespective of the actual data. Indeed, in many cases, it appears that the organization, sometimes working with the scientists, was falsifying the data to push the agenda. This stuff pre-dates Al Gore’s “frog in the blender” (or do I mean “frog in the boiling water”?) campaign, but it surely informs the campaign, which started shortly after and continued during this information creation period.
Bookworm posts two of the emails at her place and concludes with these wise words:
Horrifyingly,these confessions of the evidence of absence and the absence of honest evidence go on and on and on.
This is a huge story, and you would be doing yourself and world a big favor if you would make sure to broadcast it. It’s only if we keep the pressure on that the MSM will ever so reluctantly acknowledge the existence of this data.
You won't be seeing this much in the MSM:
It’s a story that broke first in Europe, but is making its way here. (I heard about it on NewsFifty, which is constantly adding links.) Here’s the story, briefly: Hadley GRU is one of the major climate change advocacy organizations. Hackers broke into its database and discovered more than a thousand emails and documents indicating that scientists were colluding with the organization to push the “man made global warming” mantra — irrespective of the actual data. Indeed, in many cases, it appears that the organization, sometimes working with the scientists, was falsifying the data to push the agenda. This stuff pre-dates Al Gore’s “frog in the blender” (or do I mean “frog in the boiling water”?) campaign, but it surely informs the campaign, which started shortly after and continued during this information creation period.
Bookworm posts two of the emails at her place and concludes with these wise words:
Horrifyingly,these confessions of the evidence of absence and the absence of honest evidence go on and on and on.
This is a huge story, and you would be doing yourself and world a big favor if you would make sure to broadcast it. It’s only if we keep the pressure on that the MSM will ever so reluctantly acknowledge the existence of this data.