Will conservatives admit global climate change is real if we liberals all agree to

N

- nokilleye -

New member
blame it on Obama?
Those of you that respond by haggling with me over the terms of the question and 'correcting' me by informing me conservatives doubt only the level of human involvement and not the actual 'climate change'... grow a sense of humor for god's sake! I'm simplifying the question to fit it into the heading and it is an obvious joke intended to solicit creative sarcasm, okay? -so, for those of you that respond with informative admonishments, you score high on accuracy (good for you) but you score low on creativity which means no BA and a TD for you.
 
Yes.

And more, they will stop the polar ice caps melting by cutting the benefits of those elements of society which already subsist on the lowest incomes...
 
there has never been a question as to whether it is real or not, the cause is the point of contention. there is no proof man is a major player, if there is, list it. thanks.
 
Climate charge AKA global waring is a perfect example of the tactics of ''you people''
I lived over the pond and Kyoto was all the talk ''we lead on this follow our lead We care only the Americans would not sign on watch us save the world'' Most are not living up to what they signed on too Canada has increased it's omission while the ''uncaring'' U S of A'' has decreased it's omissions Germany as omitted it's coal industry Today no one want to talk of Kyoto
It was the same with the E U so called charitable contribution to the world ''ho my we give more in aid than the Americans We are so good'' A E U commissioner exposed y'all for the B/Sers you are You were including loan forgiveness excluding what American private citizens give Which is always more than government Ever you must understand why we Americans feel y'all full of crap
The fact that you and your kind support Mr Obama makes me fearful for the next 3 years
 
Sometimes you have to throw your guy under the bus while reaching across the aisle. I applaude your non-partisanship. How about this? Let's blame it on both Bush *and* Obama. After all (and while the first part of this answer was in jest, this is not) the armies that they both direct burn a whole lot of oil.

By the way, is it officially 'climate change' now and not 'global warming'? Not trying to be argumentative - I've looked back in the time machine to when the 1970s was a time of hysteria over the next ice age. Recently, I've heard people suggesting that we are going to switch to the transitional 'climate change' and then back to 'global cooling'. I'm sorry. I can't help being a little cynical about this debate.
 
When will all the global climate change junkies finally realize that what you are all so concerned about, is in reality a very long term cycle that has led to periods of glaciation and warming, for millions of years.
Have any of you ever considered the fact that a volcanic eruption, such as Mt. St. Helens, or Mt. Pinatubo, releases mose greenhouse gasses in a matter of hours, than mankind has released since the beginning of the industrial revolution?
If you want to blame it on Obama, fine! However, I'm pretty sure that he hasn't been alive long enough to have caused it.
Finally. I don't think any of you in the global climate change crowd are even aware that the same "scientists" who are currently yelling about Global Warming, are the same group who was crying about Global Cooling in the 60's and 70's. It seems they want to have it both ways.
 
I don't care who admits what!!!!!! I just care that they keep taxing us in the name of it. Govts are useing this issue as a tax cash cow to drain us even more whilst they are only really scratching at the causes of it - if indeed it exists in the way that they tell us it exists.
 
Back
Top