Wii graphics look better than Xbox1? I think not! v.PICS ***56K DIE***

But heres a comparison:

Xbox
733mhz CPU
64mb ram
233mhz nvidia video processor

Wii
730mhz CPU (90nm technology)
243mhz ATI video processor (GPU & CPU works together)
64mb GDDR3 ram

Basically the Wii is slightly more powerful than an Xbox in terms of graphics and loading times. Newer technology is being used allowing the CPU+GPU to work together. The architecture is completely different to an Xbox so who knows how "slightly" more powerful it is.

Give the Wii 1 year, its only just come out. Compare an Xbox launch title to a game like Zelda:TP.
 
Thats a hoot alright. Too bad you dont know what you're actually on about.
You're trying to tell me that the Wii's CPU is EASILY TWICE as powerful as the Xbox one?
Get a grip on reality. Theres no 2007 Wii titles that can match DOA3 from a technical standpoint.

Metroid Prime 3 looks hardly any different from the first 2.
I've seen all the footage of it. It still cant even match Halo 1. Sure its more 'artistic' but thats barely pushing the hardware.

Each to his own, you love zelda. I do too.
But thats all Wii has got worth actually owning at the moment imo.
I'm not shelling out extra money for subpar games, most of which is already on 360 done better.
 
you're scared of the wii, that's why you're in here posting so much. you're scared of nintendo becoming more popular so you're making FOUR pages of posts to try to convince people it sucks.

if you weren't scared then you wouldn't keep posting about it. it wouldn't even be worth your attention, and yet look at all the attention you give it. it's sad.

yeah reply to this, prove me right.
 
Yeah another dissapointing console...Some games kept me going though:

Super Smash Bros, Res Evil 4, Metroid Prime 1+2...

It was great to bring to parties.
 
Zelda: Ocarina of Time did the same thing for the N64. However doesnt mean the console is going to get better after that.
I reckon Wii just used their ace card at launch which is good to get sales happening. Its no indication to whether the system will have more killer apps to scale like this.

You still havent stated what those graphical enhancements are for the Wii version of Zelda.
Thats because they are only widescreen and 480p support.
They arent 'graphical effects' they are display options so you are misleading.

The Wii has a more powerful GPU than GCN but so does Xbox.
What are you getting at?
So far the leap in graphics from cube to wii have been minimal. Alot of wii games dont look any better than what we saw on the cube, while as soon as Xbox launched everybody could see it was clearly a more powerful system.
Games like Halo, DOA3, PGR, etc were a huge leap ahead of what people were seeing on cube.

Not the case with the wii. Still looks like its displaying gamecube graphics alot of the time.
Red Steel, monkey ball, sonic, call of duty 3, tony hawk, etc. pretty much still look like gamecube games on the wii.
 
360 launch had a better selection of games than Wii's one.
IGN are fanboys so I'm not going to even bother.
Xbox without Halo would've flopped.
Wii without Twilight Princess would've flopped also.

I dont care how pointless it is, its just the truth that Wii cant even do Xbox 1 graphics and you are paying awhole lot more for a subpar system with an innovative controller thats all.

Wii is overrated in my opinion and people will come to realise this in time, I guarantee you.
When people come to play games like GoW and Mass Effect, not to mention games like DMC4, FFXIII, MGS4, etc on PS3 the Wii will be a joke in comparison.

Who's gonna pay $100 AUS for a Mario Party 10 or whatever.
Wii should've just sold for $150 and games $25 if they wanted some respect.
No point trying to offer a near next gen price when they cant justify it with next gen gameplay.
The controller is considered next gen but doesnt mean it will make the games next gen.
 
I just looked at Wii's 2007 line up and none of those games graphically beat anything on my list.
Oh yeah btw, want me to compare DOA3, Halo or Rallisport Challenge to Zelda?
Sure Zelda looks more artistic but even Xbox1 launch titles are still technically better looking.
Hell Zelda is a GCN game so its not going to look better than those anyway.
 
Show me a Xbox launch game then and compare it to Zelda.

Zelda on the Wii is graphically superior to the GC version.

My point is, the Wii is slightly more powerful than the Xbox in terms of graphics using better technology to do processes, thats a fact. You're just comparing older games with the recently released Wii games.

On a side note though, Zelda:TP has already scored better than any Xbox game ever released if you average every review magazine/site.

Its the 9th best game of all time and the Wii has only just come out:
http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/simpleratings.asp?rankings=y
 
Well the biggest difference you notice straight away is in the GC version, everything is reversed. Anything you view (map etc) is on the other side of the screen.

Lack of 480p & remote control system is a huge thing
 
I know you wont believe me but I do own a wii and the reason I'm talking about it in this manner is because I feel as if I am not getting my money's worth.
Zelda is fun, and I'm a zelda fan but even putting the graphics aside there really is no other game on the system I am interested in except perhaps metroid 3.
All other games look pitiful or dull or just washed out ports.
So how can it be all about the gameplay when the games coming out on it arent very good at all.

The system also has almost no multiplayer support. I thought this was supposed to be THE party console.
Most games I'm seeing coming out dont even offer splitscreen or link up.

Theres no talk of online either.

Btw, have you seen Gears of War in 720p?
I seriously doubt your PC would blow it out of the water.
 
Back
Top