Why won't the media debate this issue?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hemppman420
  • Start date Start date
H

hemppman420

Guest
If saying 9-11 was an inside job(or at very least the white house had warnings and then lied about it) is reason enough for michael regan on his national radio show(june 10 second hour) to say Those people should be taken to a firing range, called traitors to this country, and shot dead; He will pay for the bullets. Then it makes sense that this is an important enough issue (OR AT LEAST ENTERTAINING ENOUGH sad but true) That fox or cnn or csnbc, somebody-should have at least an hour debate to get the main questions out to the general public. If all fox can do is make these people look like shit and then a radio hosts solicits for his murder, they have definately lost all humane credibility in making this a fair issue for the general public. If all they can do is talk shit to those who read the declassified documents
 
You realize what you are proposing would create so much turmoil that it could very well dismantle the government. The thought that all those people died because of an "inside" job. We don't want to talk about it because it is common courtesy. If your family died in a country that you loved would you want to think that they were killed because they were stabbed in the back by the very land they work for?
 
It is a disgrace for anyone to think that this was an inside job. Besides, if Bill Clinton prior to Bush entering was doing his job in the first place and was investigating things, maybe this would've never happened.
 
Back
Top