It's not a lie. And it's not true.
How do you define "best". The book is obviously biased and it raises into question the moral economy (AKA moral philosophy) the author was operating under when writing it... and to what specifics it would say such a thing. Possibly there is a part in the book that supplies you with a means to contact the author, or maybe the publishing house. I would suggest that maybe you consider sending out the question rather than an outright insult and objection. Either way, I think you should post the question to the publishing house if the publisher is really concerned about publishing historical facts or political rhetoric.
Quite possibly it's using public opinion polls on Bush's presidency. If so, for the grand majority of his presidency, it is a fact that his approval ratings were rather low.
How do you define "best". The book is obviously biased and it raises into question the moral economy (AKA moral philosophy) the author was operating under when writing it... and to what specifics it would say such a thing. Possibly there is a part in the book that supplies you with a means to contact the author, or maybe the publishing house. I would suggest that maybe you consider sending out the question rather than an outright insult and objection. Either way, I think you should post the question to the publishing house if the publisher is really concerned about publishing historical facts or political rhetoric.
Quite possibly it's using public opinion polls on Bush's presidency. If so, for the grand majority of his presidency, it is a fact that his approval ratings were rather low.