Why is the Pac-10 so sad this year in football?

  • Thread starter Thread starter trer
  • Start date Start date
its just a down year for them but its not like they were that great even when they were up

If it wasn't for USC I wouldn't even consider this a BCS conference
 
No one in the Pac-10 can recruit (except USC). and even last year USC was 8th in over-all recruiting.
#1:Bama
#2:ND
#3:UF
#4:OSU
#5:Miami (FL)

actually, Oregon is in the top 20
 
USC gets all the Recruits on the west coast they want which leave nothing for other schools!!

Go USC....!!
 
The biggest question in a recruit's mind is, "What is my chance of winning a Naitonal Championship if I attend this school?" The answer is - "Little to none" - for nine of the teams.
 
Saddly, this is typical Pac-10 performance. USC is a power house not only on the field but also when recruiting new players. They often have first pick at the new talent coming out of high school. Second to this is Oregon with the amount of money Nike dumps into their program and their ugly uniforms.

Much credit to them (USC) for building the right kind of program.

(This coming from a University of Washington season ticket holder, yes, I like the pain of going to EVERY GAME).
 
Um... Oregon? I know they just lost, but most teams do lose, and Boise St. is respectable.

USC is like a pro team, it's just not fair.

And yes the Pac 10 is pretty bad
USC.... Oregon...................Arizona St..........
 
Back
Top