Why is Michael Jackson and the Iranian protesting in more news columns than...

  • Thread starter Thread starter In Articulo Mortis
  • Start date Start date
I

In Articulo Mortis

Guest
...the North Korean nuclear threats? It seems to me that a country stating that they will wipe America off the face of the Earth and blaming us for provoking a nuclear war would or should be in the news constantly. Yet there is very little in print providing any information as to what is going on with them. Are american journalists afraid to cover this? Is america so blinded by inane garbage (michael and farrah fawcett) that we really don't care anymore? Aren't we acting like we did before we were hit prior to 9/11?
 
"a country stating that they will wipe America off the face of the Earth and blaming us for provoking a nuclear war"

lol ... and you actually think North Korea can do that? I mean, really, you actually think that little third world hell hole can "wipe America off the face of the earth"? Now that is sad when people in this nation become so paranoid that they think a place like North Korea can wipe us off the face of the planet. Too funny, sort of like lil kim jong-il, what a joke.
 
North Korea makes all this silly noise every time they need another welfare check from the US. And every time they do this, our boneheaded government sends them a ton of money. There is no news to something which has been going on since Jimmy stumble bum Carter was president.
 
First off....Michael Jackson is really dead. Children all over the world are safer now.

Secondly...Iranians are really risking their lives to protest a rigged election that put a narcissistic ego-maniac into the presidential office. We should be so brave in this country.

But North Korea is making threats they can't deliver on, so it's just more of the same from that narcissistic ego-maniac, and that just isn't news.

A nuclear exchange between North Korea would at most lose the United States a few cities (if they actually have working devices).

As long as Barry doesn't get involved, the American counterstrike against North Korea would not only solve that country's food distribution problems for all time, but also provide spectacular sunrises and sunsets for many years to come.

Wiping a nation off the face of the planet would also be a useful practical example of what the United States is capable of doing (if we have a good reason to do so) to lots of 3rd-rate Islamic countries.

A sort of "I'll see your 3kt dirty bomb and raise you 80 MIRVed 500kt SLBMs and 9 leftover 1Mt citybusters we needed to get rid of anyway....."

We were ready to go to war with the Russians and slag half the planet, so the threat of a handful of tactical nukes is supposed to make us wet our pants?

We should follow Democrat Party tradition and authorize first use, then proceed to gobsmack North Korea until Japan begs us to stop...before Godzilla climbs out of Tokyo Bay and goes nuts on the city.
 
N. Korea has been screaming for attention like a bad tempered child, but as a practical matter they are of no importance to us. In particular they have zero ability to hit us with their nuclear missiles in the extremely unlikely event that would like to do so.

The danger is that they will sell nuclear weapons to terrorists, therefore we have to be, and I'm sure are, watching their shipping movements carefully and prepared to seize and search any we think might be carrying arms.
 
Back
Top