Art Angelo
New member
Give at least three examples.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why is it in any war, all countries are just losers?
- Thread starter Art Angelo
- Start date
P
piplupchimchars
Guest
is this some dumb romodel thing? Well anyway its because either way there commiting to violence and no matter who wins they both lost peoples lives for their foolish mistakes ... or something stupid like that
C
Caliban
Guest
Social costs: wars fragment society. The countries involved all lose some or the majority of fighting age population. The countries involved experience some degree of population movement, for example, fleeing war torn areas or congregating in metropolitan areas to manufacture war material. This social movement disrupts culture within geographic areas within a country or countries.
Economic costs: countries involved either have their economies severely disrupted or destroyed. Severe disruption includes going into national debt to pay for war. Destroyed economies are ones in which the means of production and supply are destroyed.
Political Costs: losing countries involved are likely to see their political structure destroyed or minimized.. Winners usually see a significant change immediately after war, for example, Churchill of England was replaced just after World War Two---the winner goes in another political direction. Also, winning countries governments' may have, due to the war, acquired more social control over their populations. The losing countries, having lost their political structure, may resort to anarchy.
Economic costs: countries involved either have their economies severely disrupted or destroyed. Severe disruption includes going into national debt to pay for war. Destroyed economies are ones in which the means of production and supply are destroyed.
Political Costs: losing countries involved are likely to see their political structure destroyed or minimized.. Winners usually see a significant change immediately after war, for example, Churchill of England was replaced just after World War Two---the winner goes in another political direction. Also, winning countries governments' may have, due to the war, acquired more social control over their populations. The losing countries, having lost their political structure, may resort to anarchy.