You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why don't science man just take a single celled organism and control it's
- Thread starter Godboy
- Start date
Take it from Vince!
New member
We have done that already.
godsuncledave
New member
Because we don't have millions of years to spare.
shasaloria
New member
Science Man? Does he wear a cape?
And it's already been done.
Thanks for playing.
And it's already been done.
Thanks for playing.
If I can find my way through your mental haze, I can say that "science man" has been fiddling with changing organisms for years. Haven't you heard of the new genetically engineered foods?
There have been hundreds of thousands of experiments with mutated organisms. Some "science men" have rendered some really nasty biologicals that way, too.
Their theory is quite correct. Nature knows it to, where the H**L do you think the N1H1 virus came from?
On the other hand, it's late in the afternoon. Let's call a truce and let me have some of that stuff you are smoking or drinking.
There have been hundreds of thousands of experiments with mutated organisms. Some "science men" have rendered some really nasty biologicals that way, too.
Their theory is quite correct. Nature knows it to, where the H**L do you think the N1H1 virus came from?
On the other hand, it's late in the afternoon. Let's call a truce and let me have some of that stuff you are smoking or drinking.
JohnsHopkins
New member
science man laugh at you and your babby.
TheDarkAtheist
New member
They have. Nylon eating bacteria, go look it up.
No, that's not how it works. I'm afraid that's your theory, which is not correct.
Their theory is far more interesting, and less retarded. Single celled organisms are more likely to clump together to avoid certain types of predation. That has actually been observed in a lab, by the way, as, I believe, has the way they then form different sorts of cells on the inside and outside of the clump. Much like multicellular organisms do. Its very, very primitive, but it is the start of multicellular life. What, you expected a cat to fandango its way out of the primordial ooze?
Their theory is far more interesting, and less retarded. Single celled organisms are more likely to clump together to avoid certain types of predation. That has actually been observed in a lab, by the way, as, I believe, has the way they then form different sorts of cells on the inside and outside of the clump. Much like multicellular organisms do. Its very, very primitive, but it is the start of multicellular life. What, you expected a cat to fandango its way out of the primordial ooze?
D
Dendronbat Crocoduck
Guest
It took nearly 2 billion years of evolution to go from eukaryotic single celled organisms to multi-celled organisms.
Rjinswand the Doctor
New member
Again?
I'm sure they could. Do you mean you want them to call you so you can come and watch?
I'm sure they could. Do you mean you want them to call you so you can come and watch?
R
racedog87
Guest
Would you ever actually believe evidence if it was presented. You keep demanding "science" to come up with evidence but always reject what they give you. Just give up man
We Wish to Buy Your Shoes
New member
You mean...scientists?
They *do* take single celled organisms and control their environments. How do you think vaccinations are made?
They *do* take single celled organisms and control their environments. How do you think vaccinations are made?
Notorious T.A.Z.
New member
You're obviously an experienced biologist. With your knowledge and experience, you should be able to answer the question?
Vernon Dozier: Redux
New member
It happened to you... and it only took 9 months.
Notorious T.A.Z.
New member
You're obviously an experienced biologist. With your knowledge and experience, you should be able to answer the question?
daniil the cavejew
New member
artificial selection. please, PLEASE google it.