...evolution debate? I'm not going to post a big article about phylogeny, endogenous retroviruses, human/ape DNA studies, vestigial organs, etc. but the info is out there and not too hard to find online. Like on talkorigins.org for example. The evidence doesn't even leave any room for debate.
Instead they come on here arguing about how humans didn't evolve from monkeys. They argue carbon 14 has a short half life and cannot possible be used to date dinosaur bones (No mention of Uranium 238, Potassium 40, Rubidium 87, etc.)
Why not just spend a couple hours objectively looking at the evidence
Instead they come on here arguing about how humans didn't evolve from monkeys. They argue carbon 14 has a short half life and cannot possible be used to date dinosaur bones (No mention of Uranium 238, Potassium 40, Rubidium 87, etc.)
Why not just spend a couple hours objectively looking at the evidence