Why doesn't the US send in the military to the biggest terrorist area in the world?

Y

You Don't Know Do You?

New member
Clinton sees evil in sex crimes in eastern Congo. 200,000 cases of sexual violence against women and girls in the region since conflict in eastern Congo.

This is terrorism, why doesn't the US have troop in this region blowing these rapist away?
 
Because they are not a threat to US allies or interests.

Also, Africa is so hopeless, you would have to kill every man, woman and child and start over from scratch.
 
Basically, all of Africa is just one big spawning pool of genocide, rape, and torture. We would have to get a multi-national armed force to invade the entire continent, kill around 3/5ths of every male in the continent, then rebuild and re-establish everything.

To fix Africa, or any nation in Africa (and yes, there are worse nations than Congo), would be like trying to fix a car engine with scotch tape.
 
The UN has to have 100% solid intel to allow any countries in the UN to invade any other country. Because there is no proof of terrorist activity, and because they haven't attacked a country within the UN, if the US were to invade, Canada, England, China, Russia, Australia, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, India, non poverted Africa, Japan, South Korea, and almost any other country not harbouring terrorists. Also, Congo as a nation is on the side of the US, so they have no juristiction over that sexual assault, just like england isn't invading USA over every rape that happens there. It's the government of Congo's responsibility to either deal with it or ask for help
 
Back
Top