objectivity
New member
when observing the 2 dynamic systems of human society and earth's ecosystems, is the point of protecting the environment to protect humanity?
if so, should change in technology that mitigate these environmental externalities mean that the environment will no longer be necessary for the continued survival of our species and therefore will be worthless to protect?
for example:
one impact of global climate change is rising ocean levels. if the human race were to develop technology that allows us to live on the ocean indefinitely and lose dependency on land, are there any other reasons why land should be protected?
if so, should change in technology that mitigate these environmental externalities mean that the environment will no longer be necessary for the continued survival of our species and therefore will be worthless to protect?
for example:
one impact of global climate change is rising ocean levels. if the human race were to develop technology that allows us to live on the ocean indefinitely and lose dependency on land, are there any other reasons why land should be protected?