Did anyone notice the amount of advertising that these two companies have conducted lately on TV? And, isn't ironic how their map of coverage includes almost the entire US while the other covers very little? How is that possible, then, that AT&T covers the whole US during their commercial, and yet, when a Verizon commercial is on they have the great coverage and AT&T has none? Does coverage just change that quickly that it changes during commercial breaks?
Also, why do both spend so much on advertising when they could both make greater profits if neither advertised?
Also, why do both spend so much on advertising when they could both make greater profits if neither advertised?