Why do the cons now whine whenever a service member is killed in action?

J

Jeff S

New member
When Bush was in office they never mentioned them!

Because as far as I am concerned every death of a service member in either Iraq or Afghanistan is more blood on Bush's hands!

The simple fact is we would not be in those countries if Bush had actually fulfilled his obligation as president and paid attention to national security before 911!
 
You ruined the validity of your question with your own opinion, which is far from reasonable. You cannot seriously blame Bush for a war Obama took us into, nor can you blame Bush for a war Obama hasn't taken us out of (despite his campaigning against the war).

I mourn every lost and wounded soldier. I did when Bush was pres and I do now. I have observed the msm was all hot to tell us of every war casualty when Bush was pres and not so much now, and I find this telling.
 
Because 0bama's waffling is causing them to die without leadership or a goal. A clear indication that his priorities are NOT the safety and protection of our troops.

You are a pinhead
 
You call it whining when a US Serviceman gets killed? Woah!

I have a much more horrible feeling in my gut than you can possibly imagine apparently.
 
Probably due to the hypocrisy of it all. The left was very interested in pointing out casualties during the Bush Administration. They aren't so keen on it now that Obama is in charge...
 
Back
Top