Why do republicans like to complain that Obama bought the election?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eyota Xin
  • Start date Start date
E

Eyota Xin

Guest
The money that he spent came crom millions of average americans.
Perhaps that is why they dont like it. The average american wasnt sending theor people that much money... in part because everyone is sick of their crap and that is just yet another reminder of that.
 
BAMA'S "PALESTINIAN" CONTRIBUTIONS FLAGGED BY FEC, OBAMA KNEW DID NOT REPORT


In digging deeper into the illegal foreign campaign contributions from Palestinians, Cathy came across these FEC letters. Obama knew these contributions were illegal and "Palestinian". He didn't report them. He took a page from his days as a "commnity organizer" for the most corrupt political machine in America. It's what they do.

Bringing the worst in American politics to the national level.

It seems the FEC actually did their job. But the chosen One-bama is special and above the law....... he is a citizen of the world.
 
On this one, as on most issues, the Republicans are WRONG AGAIN!!! ~ It absolutely WAS a "Bought" election, BUT, it was NOT Obama, who bought it; it was the American people, who have awakened, to the Republican "Spin", and UNITED, behind a better man, with a better plan!!!
 
You really need to do research..... lefties always report the second hand un true reports

Obama's overseas (foreign) contributors are making multiple small donations, ostensibly in their own names, over a period of a few days, some under maximum donation allowances, but others are aggregating in excess of the maximums when all added up. The countries and major cities from which contributions have been received France, Virgin Islands, Planegg, Vienna, Hague, Madrid, London, AE, IR, Geneva,Tokyo, Bangkok, Turin, Paris, Munich, Madrid, Roma, Zurich, Netherlands, Moscow, Ireland, Milan, Singapore, Bejing, Switzerland, Toronto, Vancouver, La Creche, Pak Chong, Dublin, Panama, Krabi, Berlin, Geneva, Buenos Aires, Prague, Nagoya, Budapest, Barcelona, Sweden, Taipei, Hong Kong, Rio de Janeiro, Sydney, Zurich, Ragusa, Amsterdam, Hamburg, Uganda, Mumbia, Nagoya, Tunis, Zacatecas, St, Croix, Mississauga, Laval, Nadi, Behchoko, Ragusa, DUBIA, Lima, Copenhagen, Quaama, Jeddah, Kabul, Cairo, Nassau(not the county on Long Island,lol), Luxembourg (Auchi's stomping grounds), etc,etc,etc,


Half a million dollars had been donated from overseas by unidentified people "not employed".


Digging deeper, all sorts of very bizarre activity jumped at us. Dr and JJ continued to break it down and pull data from various sources. We found Rebecca Kurth contributed $3,137.38 to the Obama Campaign in 112 donations, including 34 separate donations recorded in one day,


How about this gibberish donor on the 30th of April in 2008.


A donor named Hbkjb, jkbkj


City: Jkbjnj Works for: Kuman Bank (doesn't exist)


Occupation: Balanon Jalalan Amount: $1,077.23


or the donor Doodad, The # of transactions = 1,044


The $ contributed = $10,780.00


This Doodad character works for FDGFDGF and occupation is DFGFDG


The more questions we answered the more questions we discovered.


Thousands of Obama's foreign donations ended in cents. The "cents" did not make sense. And we compared McCain donation documentss to Obama's. McCain's records are nothing like Obama's. McCain's are so clean. No cents, all even dollar amounts. But Obama's contained thousands of strange, odd amounts -- evidence of foreign contributors, since Americans living overseas would almost uniformly be able to contribute dollars. Still no media.


Julia Gorin told me a funny story two months ago. Her husband's co-worker wanted to see what would happen if he tried giving a contribution to the Obama campaign via a credit card. He used his Macy's card. The system accepted it. He tried the same with McCain's campaign, and the transaction wouldn't go through. Now, obviously, down the line, the Obama transaction would fail as well, but it goes to the point that there is no safety system in place -- it'll just accept any and all money, which helps explain how his campaign raised so much more money than everyone else's.


Despite the evidence of dirty campaign donations, crickets chirped in newsrooms across the country. The moment my Gaza story started to get some chatter on talk radio, the left and their supplicant handmaidens in the media sprang into action and created a McCain illegal campaign contribution "scandal". The Washington Post published an inaccurate allegation and then retracted not a day later, at the risk of looking stupid. They are jeopardizing the little credibility that they have left.


....a Washington Post story detailing some suspicious looking contributions to the McCain campaign bundled by Harry Sargeant III. Shortly after posting, a correction appeared in the original report, as follows:
An earlier version of this story about campaign donations that Florida businessman Harry Sargeant III raised for Sen. John McCain, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton incorrectly identified three individuals as being among the donors Sargeant solicited on behalf of McCain. Those donors -- Rite Aid manager Ibrahim Marabeh, and lounge owners Nadia and Shawn Abdalla -- wrote checks to Giuliani and Clinton, not McCain. Also, the first name of Faisal Abdullah, a McCain donor, was misspelled in some versions of the story (noted by Amanda Carpenter).


So here an intrepid blogger finds a keg of dynamite of dirty dollar donations to Obama and what does the media do? They ignore it. And when forced to confront it by the sheer newsworthiness of the story, what happens? They go after McCain. They punish McCain.

And that is meant to be a lesson to all of us, Whatever you find, whatever you discover about the Candidate of Mystery, they will blow it back in your face. And they did. Almost immediately.


The irony and the upshot of all this. John McCain is reviewing contributions. Ain't that a kick in the head. I can tell him he needn't bother. Been there, done that. Nothing to see, keep moving.


Obama's out there raising millions, some in illegal donations and the Washing
 
Yea it just more people liked him, That is how he got ll that money lol.

Grow up Neo cons.
 
For 50 years small donors gave to the republican party and large ones to the democratic. Then before the last election the rules were changed to allow anonymous donors under 250 dollars. Predictably, the democrats saw a sudden flood of donations from dubious sources and George Soros that they were unwilling or unable to to accept before.

I feel the democrats bought the votes of poor people by promising them handouts. They used class warfare to get elected.
 
For the group of Repubs who do, it's so because:
1. Because they can't stand to see a BLACK president!
2. Because they're ignorant and they didn't do their homework
3. Because they're republican and he's a democrat
4. They don't like Obama

There really isn't proof. People try to make up proof. Obama won fair and square. He's our new president and there's nothing they can do about it. Besides, Barack didn't buy the election.
 
Most of his money came from out of country. Almost 600 million dollars. Hamas also contributed, your heros.
 
They don't.

Send me the link that shows this. My email is open.

If you were from America you would know this isn't true. Trying to be an authority on America from Singapore isn't easy is it?
 
Average american, like Oprah, Madonna, Rosie O'Donnell, Most of Hollywood, gays and lesbians, are not average americans.
 
Because they're used to being able to buy elections - simple jealousy.

And I don't want to hear any right-wing sycophants whining about the media. If anything, the media was biased towards McCain, as they provided the veneer of a respectable campaign for him, when the reality was that he broke his word and ran a despicable smear campaign, while he and his staff wandered aimlessly amongst a multitude of policy positions, panders, and stunts, seemingly unsure what to do about a number of minor and major crises during the campaign. Meanwhile, the rest of the world laughed as the senile old man demonstrated his apparent inability to grasp the reality that the multipolar world of 2008 wasn't the unipolar world of 1993, when the US was basically the only game in town as far as international influence.

I've voted for quite a few Republicans, but this year's presidential election was no contest. The weight of the evidence clearly favored Obama, no question. Yet the corporate media kept up the fantasy that the decision between the two was a 50-50 toss-up. Had we had a real, free, objective media, unrestrained by corporate interests, Obama would have won 75% of the vote.
 
Republicans claim to give more but when it comes down to it they were out spent.
 
I've never heard one Republican say that. If anything the media gave him the election.

Please show me an answer or source that complains about that. I'll be waiting.
 
Are you sure about where all that money came from?

Both parties are plenty guilty of cutting corners where campaign finance shenanigans are concerned. Many contributions are not quite as illegal as they are unethical, but I'm sure much of Obama's campaign money came from places you'd be shocked to find out about. (And I'm not saying the Republicans are any cleaner, as much of a Republican as I am.)

I'm far too cynical to trust a politician when he says he got all his campaign money above board. For all you know, Obama told some NRA group he liked their ideas and got money from them, only to turn around and use that money to fight the NRA. It's just what politicians do.
 
I'm just sick of all the crap coming out of BO's mouth.
To answer ur question, Obama won the election in part because he had so much money to spend on advertising. It is legitimate for a Republican to claim that Obama won because of the enormous amount of cash at his disposal, but that is one among many reasons of his victory.
 
Back
Top