Why do Republicans cling to their religion and guns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter digital jello
  • Start date Start date
If you think Democrats haven't mastered it too, and that's there is really ANY major differences in the two parties, you're deluding yourself hardcore.

Politicians are professional liars, and we are the ones who let them run everything into the ground. Until we return to understanding, embracing, and upholding our Constitution, as well as remember what self-responsibility and dignity are, this country will only continue to get worse and worse, regardless of who is in charge.

Obama is of the same cut as Bush, and both of them as every other politician.
 
Never mentioned that.

I find it pointless to include sex scandals and leave out international scandals that actually did affect the country and its allies.
 
It's pointless to study the second impeachment of a president in the nation's history? Sounds like you're bias leans toward protecting democratic presidents.
 
Serious answer:

Religion makes more sense once you're older, and don't think you'll live forever. Guns make sense after you've seen enough government abuses.
 
Yes, God forbid that we look at internal, MAJOR issues like the 2nd impeachment process of a president ever done in this country.

FOCUS ON THE WORLD
 
Bush there's no room left on Bush's nuts what with all the repubs clinging to them
 
and yet the previous liberal controlled texas board refused to allow teachings of black founding fathers like Peter Armistead and Peter Salem into school books.
 
If politicians really only cared about winning elections, they would propose the EXACT same platform every four years, one which was aimed at EXACTLY what the median voter wants. Economists, political scientists, and game theory buffs have known this for decades.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median_Voter_Theory

Since politicians always have differences in the platforms they propose (sometimes significant ones), they MUST care about something other than winning. They don't necessarily give a rat's ass about the population, but they have to care about something besides solely winning elections.

Or, if they do care solely about winning elections, they're being really, really stupid and winning with less frequency than they should be
 
go read my post again. I never said 'leave out' or 'not important enough'. Im more concerned about the dumbing down of this curriculum. If a sex scandal is important than many other events should be added.
 
Back
Top