J
Jason P
Guest
I don't see how this is bad for baseball. It provides a different level of interest to the game. I don't pay too much attention to the AL most of the year, so I like seeing the change for a few series each year. I like being able to watch different teams than the usual trip through the NL. I like to see the best players in the AL play against the NL and, more specifically, the Brewers.
In fact, I think there should be more games added to the interleague schedule. I would like to see six extra games added so all AL teams play 24 interleague games and all NL teams play 21. Each team should have another geographic rival that they play one series against each year (for example, have the Brewers and White Sox play each year). Then, use a league's total interleague record to decide who gets home field for the World Series, which league does better in 336 total interleague games. That's a better indicator than 1 meaningless All-Star game.
In fact, I think there should be more games added to the interleague schedule. I would like to see six extra games added so all AL teams play 24 interleague games and all NL teams play 21. Each team should have another geographic rival that they play one series against each year (for example, have the Brewers and White Sox play each year). Then, use a league's total interleague record to decide who gets home field for the World Series, which league does better in 336 total interleague games. That's a better indicator than 1 meaningless All-Star game.