Why do peope who don't understand science assume they can debate scientists?

They suffer from the same narrow minded arrogance that drives atheists and Theists alike to tell me that my Animist beliefs are invalid.
They "think" they know what they're talking about.
Their "thinking" is my "delusion".
 
why do ppl who dont understand God think they can debate Christians??? this isnt science here and we dont care about debating their lies!!!!!!!!!!
 
You don't need ardous preparation , hard work, resaerch, intelligence, practice etc to debate on something on which you can say anything
 
Probably because they don't feel comfortable with things scientists tell them.

And because scientists are wrong SO MUCH of the time. If scientists disagree with each other, that means one of the Ph.D earning people has to be wrong.
 
They really have no idea of the amount of intelligence, dedication, hard work and supreme effort that scientists need to apply to their tasks.
Bearing in mind that science works FOR all of mankind. Including them.

It is deep rooted ignorance and savage vindictiveness that makes them think that they know better than others.
 
Science and the scientific method are actually transparent, and meant to be understood by anyone who takes the time to educate themselves about the material. It's one of the building blocks pf science.

However, the key there is that they actually have to educate themselves and learn something before they are capable of debating it. It would be like me saying how terrible George Orwell's 1984 is, despite never having read the book. My entire opinion comes from Orwells arch rival who doesn't like nor cares about his writing, who tells me what to think.

So yeah. As someone once said, if there is anyone who is best fit to refute 150 years of some of the greatest scientific discoveries in human history, it's a washed-up born-again Evangelical Christian child actor with a tv-friend named B.oner.


And for posterity and clarity, I have *never* met, spoken to, or seen a Creationist who was remotely educated on Evolution. What does that say about Creationism?
 
They cut and paste stuff written by idiots like "Doctor diploma mill" Kent Hovind believing it makes sense. A brainwashed Xian can be led to believe anything. Then armed with this useless tripe they think they can ask a question to stump those smart@ss atheists.
 
They think that their holy book has all the answers anyone will ever need, and anyone who discovers anything that contradicts the words of their book is not only wrong but evil.

They are arrogant, provincial, xenophobic, and utterly full of themselves.

In other words, they are ideal fundamentalists.
 
They think that their holy book has all the answers anyone will ever need, and anyone who discovers anything that contradicts the words of their book is not only wrong but evil.

They are arrogant, provincial, xenophobic, and utterly full of themselves.

In other words, they are ideal fundamentalists.
 
We need some TV watching and potato chip eating scientists. If you are talking about evolution pseudo-scientists the PhD just means "piled higher and deeper". That is what I thing (think) about it.
 
Arrogance and ignorance - pure and simple. They are convinced they are right so don't confuse them with the facts as they have already made up their minds. Sad but true.
 
Back
Top