Why do loser Republicans say the media's liberal? Why on God's Earth would they

Thank you for resorting to personal attacks.

There may be many reasons for this, which I am not privileged to answer.

CNN and MSNBC were easy on Obama and hard on Palin. If you choose to not see it, you will make bad decisions. I try to be open minded enough because I want to make an informed decision.
 
Look at the mainstream media. They have a Liberal slant on everything. Gun Control, Abortion, Socialized Medicine. This is common in this country. It always has been and probably always will be. How can anyone deny that?
 
You never see American Indians or Asian people in America playing the race card do you? They are usually the last ones on welfare or in the media crying.
 
The mainstream media is controlled by advertisers, so the corporate agenda shapes it's content. No surprise there. There's this whole myth of the "liberal media", whatever that means. It's total nonsense that falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. In fact if you look at it, the straight press has an overwhelming tendency in the opposite direction. Due to the stations being owned by huge media conglomerates, there's virtually no deviation from the right-wing norm. So for example, when Israel was carrying out ethnic cleansing a couple of months ago, nobody that I know of(maybe you can find an exception) in the corporate press questioned the morality of the massive U.S. support that's been given to the largest terrorist state in the Middle East for over four decades. It was never even brought up. So that should give you an idea on how narrow the range of debate is that is allowed to enter the mainstream arena. Of course the moronic talking heads all cry "LIBERAL MEDIA!!!" without offering any evidence(and seemingly failing to realize that they are, in fact, the media elite), so that becomes the question that's allowed; "Is the media too liberal?" An assertion that falls flat on it's face when thought about rationally for three seconds.
 
Did your Liberal bias`` media tell you this ? It`s in the Uhbama`s donkey dung "Health Care Bill !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or are you like the socialist liberal democrats that speak and vote on issues` they don`t know anything about because they haven`t read the Bill ? No Health Services for Dementia Patients ?
Discrimination against the elderly when it comes to healthcare is not discrimination — at least not to a key member of the Barack Obama administration.
Ezekiel Emanuel is director of the Clinical Bioethics Department at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and an architect of Obama's healthcare reform plan. He is also the brother of Rahm Emanuel, Obama's White House chief of staff.
Express Riders, the blog of conservative businessman and philanthropist Foster Friess, reports that Ezekiel Emanuel has written that health services should not be guaranteed to "individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens."
He also stated, "An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia," according to Friess' site.
Friess also points to an equally troubling article co-authored by Emanuel, which appeared in the medical journal The Lancet in January. It read in part: "Unlike allocation [of healthcare] by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination. Every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age.
"Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years.
"Treating 65-year-olds differently because of stereotypes or falsehoods would be ageist; treating them differently because they have already had more life-years is not."
Friess asks: "Are these the values we want undergirding our healthcare system?"
 
Because the media's are liberal, the problem is that some people are just to dumb to see it.
 
Back
Top