Why do libs still associate that What Clinton did in the white house was all about

S

sky

New member
So let's see:

Lying about an affair is bad--to you conservatives--but lying about a country possessing WMDs and getting 4200 troops killed in the process, is okay?
 
sex, nothing more? I just read a post on another question about how all Clinton did was have an affair like many presidents did and that was all. Don't libs know by now that is wasn't about an affair, but about his lying under oath that was horrid? BTW, I think Clinton was an OK president, but not great. So, do you think libs will EVER understand that it wasn't about sex?
No sunshine, it became public when he was caught and LIED under oath. Have you not noticed that everything a president does is under the spotlight?
 
It WAS about sex and it was also about small minded voyeuristic sexually frustrated horn-dog mean little Republicans who stupidly believed that trapping a president into lying under oath about a totally personal matter was a crime worthy of impeachment.
Larry Flint was right on target when he offered Ken Starr a job and said that as long as Starrr was doing such a good job promoting pornography in America then Starr should work for Hustler magazine
 
Back
Top