Why do evolutionists constantly lose debates to Young Earth Creationists?

The only reason that "evolutionists" ever lose debates to Young Earth Creationists is because the Creationists arbitrarily determine what "victory" is and declare themselves the "winner," despite the reality of the situation. It's sort of like playing chess against an opponent who believes they win when all of their pieces are taken off the board.
 
What's an evolutionist? Perhaps you mean biologist or scientist. I don't recall anyone losing a debate to YEC.
 
I would love to see a creationist win a debate against anyone who knows anything about evolution. Something tells me you pulled your facts directly from your anus.
 
What are you talking about? Its like common sense, you cant just think something just popped up on Earth from some invisible guy in the sky. I mean really cmon what propaganda is this?

***By the way evolution is not a religion its a scientific theory.
 
Where? At Liberty University where the crowd is a bunch of creationists? Maybe, this hardly compromises evolutionary theory.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051224100718.htm

http://www.nyas.org/ebriefreps/main.asp?intEBriefID=634

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14094-bacteria-make-major-evolutionary-shift-in-the-lab.html

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081110223331.htm
 
I've been viewing and participating in debates with Creationists for just about a decade now, and I have yet to see one win against an "evolutionist", whether it be a random Joe Shmo, or a big wig at AiG, or anything in between.

Perhaps providing a link to an example of a creationist actually winning a debate would be useful.
 
Back
Top