Why do Democrats blame Bush for 9/11 and the financial meltdown, but not

Cheer Up

New member
Obama for incidents in his own house? For example, the WH party crashers.

Why is it, when the president is Republican, then every single thing is automatically blamed on a "failure of presidential leadership,"

but when the president is a Democrat then they take out their magnifying glass and start the search for the real culprit?

Then they end up blaming the cleaning lady, or the lady who was in charge of the guest list...
 
Because many democrats are biased in favor of President Obama and against President Bush, just as many republicans are biased against President Obama and in favor of President Bush.

I wish people would put partisanship aside and just look at facts.
 
So on one hand we have Bush's 9/11 and financial crisis, and on the other hand we have Obama's party crashers.

I can see how people would view those as being equally important issues.
 
Because 2 party crashers is no big deal--except for you trolls; whom want to make an issue out of something ridiculous as a couple of people slipping in to shake hands with Obama and have their picture taken.

9/11 and the financial meltdown? THOSE ARE MORE EGREGIOUS ISSUES!
 
You can't seriously be comparing 9/11, the Iraq war and financial meltdown with party crashers.

If you can't see the difference, there is really nothing to say.
 
Back
Top