when it's a scientific fact? It has just as much evidence as the theory of the earth revolving around the sun. It seems that creationists just repeat the stupid arguments they have heard instead of doing any research on the topic.
What's the point of arguing when evolutionists know that there is an overwhelming amount of evidence for evolution and that creationist arguments are based off of misunderstanding; and creationists refuse to listen to logic or do research?
@Rapturer,
You have sucessfully demonstrated everything that I accused creationists of. Repeating stupid arguments of others, check. Misunderstanding of evolution, check.
And where the hell did you hear that evolution says that life came from a rock???? First off, the theory of abiogenesis explains the creation of life. Second, abiogenesis states that life came from a "soup" of nucleotides billions of years ago. The nucleotides bonded together and displayed natural selection. Nucleotide sequences that had better structures would be able to gain more nucleotides to their chain.
What's the point of arguing when evolutionists know that there is an overwhelming amount of evidence for evolution and that creationist arguments are based off of misunderstanding; and creationists refuse to listen to logic or do research?
@Rapturer,
You have sucessfully demonstrated everything that I accused creationists of. Repeating stupid arguments of others, check. Misunderstanding of evolution, check.
And where the hell did you hear that evolution says that life came from a rock???? First off, the theory of abiogenesis explains the creation of life. Second, abiogenesis states that life came from a "soup" of nucleotides billions of years ago. The nucleotides bonded together and displayed natural selection. Nucleotide sequences that had better structures would be able to gain more nucleotides to their chain.