Why do christians continue to argue and fight when they are shown evidence that

B

Biker for Life

New member
contradicts their beliefs? When atheists are proven wrong on a subject, they don't continue to fight in the face of undeniable fact. However, when the most devout of religious folks are proven wrong on a subject, especially the Bible, they will fight to defend their beliefs until they are blue in the face, and sometimes screaming is involved.
 
You can hear screaming on the internet....Can you prove that?

I realize that's just embellishment.

Atheists keep asking for physical evidence for Spirit. It's their sacrifice for their own kind. And I respect that.
 
You can hear screaming on the internet....Can you prove that?

I realize that's just embellishment.

Atheists keep asking for physical evidence for Spirit. It's their sacrifice for their own kind. And I respect that.
 
I have yet to meet a new atheist who can string together even a half tenable argument.

They are good at some things, such as name calling, handing out insults, making up their own version of history, regurgitating Gerald Massey's made up version of Egyptian mythology, making unsubstantiated claims ("the Bible was edited at the Council of Nicea")..... they are good at all those things.

But coming out with even a half tenable argument? Not a chance.
 
I don't argue and fight over what I believe. I only proclaim the truth of God to the best of my ability and by the grace God gives me.

God's word has never been disproven, nor is it contradictory.
 
The religion itself is centuries old. But it changes, adapts, evolves according to new beliefs, translations, etc etc. Most people who argue something like this, were brought up in it. Were you brought up a Christian, do you presume that if you were that you might understand it better?

Perhaps you were but still question your beliefs, well those with the faith complex don't question their beliefs as often, and so they argue for their beliefs.
 
The religion itself is centuries old. But it changes, adapts, evolves according to new beliefs, translations, etc etc. Most people who argue something like this, were brought up in it. Were you brought up a Christian, do you presume that if you were that you might understand it better?

Perhaps you were but still question your beliefs, well those with the faith complex don't question their beliefs as often, and so they argue for their beliefs.
 
Marshall, I wasn't going to answer but your post brought me back.

You've been told that an Omnipotent Entity Who Loves Us is impossible b/c we suffer, right ? I mean, it's one of the oldest arguments against the Christian (or Islamic or Jewish) god in the book.

Christians insist that God is omnipotent and loves us. Suffering proves this god doesn't exist.

Omnipotence: you get what you want, right away, without effort, no excuses.
Love: you want the loved ones to be happy.

If A, then B. NOT B, therefore NOT A.
If an omnipotent entity loves us, we are happy. We are not happy. Therefore an omnipotent entity does not love us.

Theists hear this all the time and simply redefine love, redefine omnipotence or make excuses for a supposedly omnipotent being.

The reasons theists believe is as follows:
They want heaven.
They fear hell.
They've been told that all evidence and argument against their theism is a magic trick from Satan to lead them astray. So they intentionally ignore evidence and argument against their theism and glorify this as a virtue they call 'faith'.
This is what we see again and again. You'll now insist that theists are capable of being intelligent, completely missing what I've actually just said. Read it again. Carefully this time. Faith is fear and desire and NOT a failure of intelligence. If it were a failure of intelligence, then theists would be honestly literally retarded and we'd have to feel sorry for them.
 
Back
Top