Why did Fox news give the Gay rights march on Washington barely 4 minutes of

[Back]

coverage, whereas they complained? They complained that other networks didn't cover the Tea Party protests, which they devoted hours of live coverage to.. Yet a genuine grassroots protest occurs on Washington, they didn't even send a reporter there?
Of Course they have a right to cover what they want. But they criticized all the other media outlets for not covering as much of the Tea parties as they did.

 

[Rush Limbaugh]

There are more important things to deal with than A Gay Right's Army thing

 

[mamadixie]

They have a right to decide which news stories they will give a lot of coverage, just as all the rest have.

Believe it or not, the tea parties are also grassroots.

 

[ruth]

Freedom of the press, dearie.

Why did CNN spend all day on a hoax and run a banner across the bottom about Ruth Ginsberg?

 

[Flags of Our Fathers]

Because homosexual "rights" is one big joke.

 

[Captain Awesome]

Because being gay is not a right, just like being a pedo isnt

 

[Ted Kennedy's Car]

Considering that you only watch FOX for 4 min at a time, you can't therefore extrapolate that they only carried the story for four min.

In case you were unaware, the FOX keeps broadcasting even AFTER you turn your TV off.

Just so you know.

 

[Englishman in Kentucky]

The majority of Patriotic Americans view the TEA movement as news, not all Americans love the homosexual scene, therefore they are catering to a majority not a minority that beat people up in the streets when Prop 8 failed..

 

[Phil]

they don't give a rats @ss what morons like you think.

 

[Grouchy Crab]

They probably figure most of their audience is not interested in the gay rights movement.