Wouldn't this promote true competition?
Further, doesn't a top-down managerial and financial approach for delivering service achieve greater cost-efficiency than the multitude of replicate administrative units each company must operate in each individual state?
Lastly, wouldn't taxpayers in each state benefit if individual Insurance Commissions are no longer necessary?
No, this isn't the idea of a co-op. This entails a singular entity to offer Universal coverage and the winning contractor does so by making bids on the offered rates. What this does is insure a decisively, cheapest rate, but free the Feds from actually running the operation. The contractor would insure compliance, but could not reject anyone from coverage and the criteria for treatment would be a uniform protocol.
Further, doesn't a top-down managerial and financial approach for delivering service achieve greater cost-efficiency than the multitude of replicate administrative units each company must operate in each individual state?
Lastly, wouldn't taxpayers in each state benefit if individual Insurance Commissions are no longer necessary?
No, this isn't the idea of a co-op. This entails a singular entity to offer Universal coverage and the winning contractor does so by making bids on the offered rates. What this does is insure a decisively, cheapest rate, but free the Feds from actually running the operation. The contractor would insure compliance, but could not reject anyone from coverage and the criteria for treatment would be a uniform protocol.