Why are there so many BP defenders in here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter |3illy the |&lt
  • Start date Start date
3

|3illy the |&lt

Guest
Criminally? Without conjecture, no. There does seem to be a long problematic history with the Deep Horizon venue and BP's ineptitude at running it.

They are guilty of offenses that will lead to fines.
 
I thought the majority of this forum were libertarians and conservatives.


Don't we hold businesses responsible for their mistakes?
 
They are guilty of loving America so much that they risked the lives of several rig workers so they could bring cheap oil to the people. BP IS GUILTY OF LOVING TOO MUCH!!! NOW TO TACO BELL IN MY 1/2 TON SO I CAN GET FAT AND HAVE FREE HEALTH CARE!!!
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/may/12/deepwater-gulf-oil-spill-hearing

BP was aware of equipment problems aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig hours before the explosion pumped millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, a congressional hearing was told yesterday .
In a second day of hearings, the House of Representatives's energy and commerce committee said documents and company briefings suggested that BP, which owned the well; Transocean, which owned the rig; and Halliburton, which cemented into place the casing for the well, ignored tests in the hours before the 20 April explosion that indicated faulty safety equipment.
"Yet it appears the companies did not suspend operations, and now 11 workers are dead and the gulf faces an environmental catastrophe," Henry Waxman, the chair of the energy and commerce committee, said, demanding to know why work was not stopped.
 
one possible reason you don't drill 200 feet below sea level is a hurricane could destroy the BOP with 100 foot waves. That hasn't been tested, I don't think.
 
yes, but throw them under the bus after the situation is over. let them pay the bills first!
 
Now Mr. Hayward, I don't want you thinking about this right now. You've got way too many other things to focus on, and this should take a lower priority. But let's say, in a year or two, if BP has not gone under, and the oil spill has been mostly cleaned up, and wildlife, fishing, and life in general begins to get back to some sense of order in the Gulf, your board should seriously consider a big change.*
Change your name.

Since this tragedy started, designers and non-designers have been donating their best ideas and concepts to various blogs and Web sites to help rebrand BP as they think you should be represented now. I must say, it's not pretty. Greenpeace has been running a contest . Some have even been posted here on FC . I thought it might be nice to consider, just for a moment, what really needs to happen on the other side of this mess, so we as a global society never forget.

Some things definitely need to go. The name BP itself, for instance. BP will be associated with the prospect of criminal charges and thousands of civil law suits. I'm not sure anyone will ever again be able to look at those initials and not think Big Problems. So drop them. Change your primary color. You've tainted the color green now so it is meaningless. For some time design experts (and environmentalists) have been asking green clients and consumers to consider alternatives for this overused color. I suggest blue. A sophisticated hue. One that eludes to a higher order. Blue is the new green . Blue is sincere. Blue is honest. Blue is calming. Blue is American. Blue is the Gulf (or will be again someday). And for this, we will never forget.
*
I am assuming, sir, we are all learning some hard and valuable lessons*
from this disaster. I know the people of the Gulf are. I think the government is. I imagine your stockholders have. We need to spend the required money not just to promote the idea of a cleaner existence, but to actually walk*
the talk and live a cleaner existence. Spend the money on new*
technology. Spend the money on better safety measures. Spend the money*
that you claimed to have already spent on making sure the dead battery*
on the dead man's switch isn't dead. You get the point. Be better. Be*
honest. Be sincere. And what better way to demonstrate your changed ways than to reposition your brand with a new name a revitalized brand. For that, look in your closet.
*
So here's an idea that just might work. Bring back the Amoco name. You purchased the brand some years ago, and ultimately shuttered it. It may be ready for a new look and a comeback. Perhaps this change could start an entire design thinking process that really looks at what a new global energy company would/should look like. And especially how it would/should act. Who knows where that kind of thinking might take us. Somewhere positive, I hope.*
 
So in other words BP was notified by the people who owned and ran the rig were the ones aboard the rig and they did nothing to correct the problem. If the bank owns your home and you ruin it then it shouldn't be the banks fault you failed to maintain your home.
 
Big business dick sucking crew.

I was met with so much ridicule when I claimed several years ago that Wall St CEOs are morons.
 
or maybe it was because they didn't come equipped with assault rifles and tear gas to subdue the unruly BP employees into submission
 
and there those morons sit with their multi million dollar paychecks while your genius simply allows you to copy paste articles.
 
I think they are....but I've seen people upset that they're expected to deal with many things at once as if they're not a multi-national corporation thinking about paying out billions in dividends in about a week.
 
Back
Top