...bigger risk for health problems? Such as the obese who never exercise or those with multiple sexual partners, to name a few? It's sickening to me that the modern society thinks that cigarettes are instant death, that a little "second hand smoke" will kill them (studies show even indoors the amount of smoke they'd breath in is less than 10% of that of a smoker), and don't know that a thin smoker that doesn't overdue it is less likely to have health problems than an obese non-smoker. It might also be worth noting that most (at least a surprisingly disproportionate number) of the centurion record breakers were/are lifelong smokers, many of them chain smokers who rarely if ever touched alcohol. How can this be explained with all the "scientific" studies that have apparently proven that smoking is so bad for you?
I don't even smoke anymore but I'm tired of smokers being treated as second class citizens. How does my smoking at home or outside completely away from you affect you AT ALL? Where do non-smokers get off being so rude to smokers who want nothing more but to live their lives and enjoy what they want to do? You can go on to live to 130 for all I care but you were one of the suckers who's fallen for the lies about smoking and your answer proves it. 10 years ago there was a difference between non-smokers and anti-smokers; today it seems they are one in the same.
I don't even smoke anymore but I'm tired of smokers being treated as second class citizens. How does my smoking at home or outside completely away from you affect you AT ALL? Where do non-smokers get off being so rude to smokers who want nothing more but to live their lives and enjoy what they want to do? You can go on to live to 130 for all I care but you were one of the suckers who's fallen for the lies about smoking and your answer proves it. 10 years ago there was a difference between non-smokers and anti-smokers; today it seems they are one in the same.