Why are Dems Being Racist by Supporting GM's UAW and Opposing Alabama's Toyota Workers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Janet
  • Start date Start date
J

Janet

Guest
Is this like when Dems required union contracts to be used after Katrinia so that young blacks in New Orleans could not benefit from jobs?
 
Not racist. They are being good little lackeys and returning the favors bought and paid for by the campaign contributions made by the UAW and the auto companies.
 
That's a stretch of your imagination to say that. All the unions have many blacks among their memberships...unlike the Republican party which is disproportional mostly whites.

The union requirement after Katrina (if there really was one) probably had to do with keeping out the scammers that usually show up after disasters to cheap people with substandard work.
 
I don't get the racist connection there Bucky.
I don't want to see the big 3 fail and hope they get the loans, but the racist thing makes no sense and you have little, if anything to back it up.
 
Because when Dems do it, it's just politics. When Republicans do it, they're the evil racist rich bogeymen.

The press loves Barry Obama and his peeps.
 
There is nothing racist about it. Democrats have traditionally been supported by labor unions and vice versa. This effort to kill the Big 3 is just the Republicans' union-busting effort.
 
Toyota's employees do not own the Dems like Ford and GM unions do. Remember, Dems hate Walmart bc they are not unionized.
 
Back
Top