Why are climate change skeptics calling for a debate on the issue?

T

Trevor

New member
What new issues do that have that they wish to bring to the debating table?

Why did they elect not to participate in the debate in the past?

Has their conduct these last two weeks destroyed their credibility?

What would they hope to achieve by having a debate?

What would they debate about and with whom?
 
Only alarmists have the fantasy that there is no climate change except for what people cause. They think that because the mythology of significant human caused warming is based on leftist political activists that call themselves scientists who manipulated the data to remove the little ice age and the medeival warm period. There really isn't anything to debate because the rug has been pulled out from under their silly scam. Only deluded or ignorant individuals still support the hockey stick or algores nonsense about the CO2 causing the warming in his deceptive graph. The nature of the science of the leftists is so pathetic, it is hard to believe that the standards of science graduates has deteriorated so much that many would buy that nonsense. You have to be completely gullible to accept their computer models that are proven beyond doubt that they don't predict the present or the future. How much failure of their theory do we need or proof of the lying to conclude they aren't at all credible.
 
"Why are climate change skeptics calling for a debate on the issue?"

To expose the genocidal fraud of Al Gore, David Rockefeller, Prince Philip, and their acolytes.

--

"Why did they elect not to participate in the debate in the past?"

Skeptics were not allowed to do so, as the Warmist charlatans controlled the terms of the debate.

--

"Has their conduct these last two weeks destroyed their credibility?"

No, but the criminal conduct of Warmists over the last two decades and more most definitely has destroyed theirs.

--

"What would they hope to achieve by having a debate?"

Again, to expose this quackery for what it is: a genocidal fraud and massive criminal conspiracy.

--

"What would they debate about"

About the AGW fraud, obviously.

--

"and with whom?"

Good question. Most of the top Warmist fraudsters are unwilling to debate skeptics for obvious reasons, so who knows?
 
Back
Top