Squid,
Boy, you sure are angry! I'm not sure about what, but your anger is evident.
www.dictionary.com defines idiot as:
1.an utterly foolish or senseless person.
2.Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.
I'm aware that you used the word "idiots" to insult lawyers rather than "stupid." I assumed you were using the word "idiot" in the familiar sense, that is, synonymous with "stupid." It is, after all, this usage that is most common. And frankly, judging from the context of your insult, I suspect that notwithstanding your claim to the contrary, this was in fact what you meant. (Evidenced, btw, by your adoption of this colloquial definition of "idiot" in your response when you posed the rhetorical question, "I guess that depends on your definition of stupid," and then answered your own question, "In my book, being "Arrogant. Obnoxious. Boring. Self-Centered. Over-bearing. Condescending. Manipulative. Talkative." means you're stupid.")
But never mind. Let's assume, arguendo, that you in fact used the word "idiot," as you now claim, in the secondary sense of the word, to mean, "having the mental age of a three year old child." So that means, "in [your] book, being 'Arrogant. Obnoxious. Boring. Self-Centered. Over-bearing. Condescending. Manipulative. Talkative.' means you have the mental age of a three year old child?"
Are you sure that's what you want to say? Keep digging. It's amusing.
Elton
Boy, you sure are angry! I'm not sure about what, but your anger is evident.
www.dictionary.com defines idiot as:
1.an utterly foolish or senseless person.
2.Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.
I'm aware that you used the word "idiots" to insult lawyers rather than "stupid." I assumed you were using the word "idiot" in the familiar sense, that is, synonymous with "stupid." It is, after all, this usage that is most common. And frankly, judging from the context of your insult, I suspect that notwithstanding your claim to the contrary, this was in fact what you meant. (Evidenced, btw, by your adoption of this colloquial definition of "idiot" in your response when you posed the rhetorical question, "I guess that depends on your definition of stupid," and then answered your own question, "In my book, being "Arrogant. Obnoxious. Boring. Self-Centered. Over-bearing. Condescending. Manipulative. Talkative." means you're stupid.")
But never mind. Let's assume, arguendo, that you in fact used the word "idiot," as you now claim, in the secondary sense of the word, to mean, "having the mental age of a three year old child." So that means, "in [your] book, being 'Arrogant. Obnoxious. Boring. Self-Centered. Over-bearing. Condescending. Manipulative. Talkative.' means you have the mental age of a three year old child?"
Are you sure that's what you want to say? Keep digging. It's amusing.
Elton