SO I was reading that some parents are trying to sue McDonald's for serving such bad food to their children, and I was watching another documentary that was saying that fast food restaurants such as Burger King, and KFC are only located in low income areas, and that there should be laws regulating the number of restaurants located in low income areas.
I agree that there should be a regulation on the number of restaurants located in low income areas, and that the government should force healthier produce into low income areas so that people can get it, but that's just my opinion.
Parents and children should research what they are eating and stop trying to blame people for their lack of parenting.
I eat junk food once in a while, and have stopped eating meat because of the poor quality supplied to restaurants because it is cheaper to buy the poor quality and pay the fees than to buy better quality meat.
do you really think the government will stop ban KFC and McDonald's in low income areas? AS far as I know, they are only located in low income areas, so they would be gone completely.
comments? California has banned happy meals so now now one can supply them to their children, but there are still other more expensive restaurants that sell bad food, who aren't being criticized.
Example, One Vente Starbucks coffee has a minimum of 320 calories! I don't see anyone complaining about that! In fact the average American drinks starbucks twice a day which means you are getting at least 640 calories just from a drink!
Even more expensive restaurants serve food that isn't good for you. The quality of the fruits, vegetables, and meat might be higher than that at fast food chains, BUT they cover it with sauce, salt and butter making the nutrition value almost as bad or lower than that of fast food chains!
I think the food industry on a whole needs to look at what their serving people and realize that it's right to serve anyone such poor meals. I prefer to cook at home, sometimes I just eat cereal but I force myself to eat better!
I agree that there should be a regulation on the number of restaurants located in low income areas, and that the government should force healthier produce into low income areas so that people can get it, but that's just my opinion.
Parents and children should research what they are eating and stop trying to blame people for their lack of parenting.
I eat junk food once in a while, and have stopped eating meat because of the poor quality supplied to restaurants because it is cheaper to buy the poor quality and pay the fees than to buy better quality meat.
do you really think the government will stop ban KFC and McDonald's in low income areas? AS far as I know, they are only located in low income areas, so they would be gone completely.
comments? California has banned happy meals so now now one can supply them to their children, but there are still other more expensive restaurants that sell bad food, who aren't being criticized.
Example, One Vente Starbucks coffee has a minimum of 320 calories! I don't see anyone complaining about that! In fact the average American drinks starbucks twice a day which means you are getting at least 640 calories just from a drink!
Even more expensive restaurants serve food that isn't good for you. The quality of the fruits, vegetables, and meat might be higher than that at fast food chains, BUT they cover it with sauce, salt and butter making the nutrition value almost as bad or lower than that of fast food chains!
I think the food industry on a whole needs to look at what their serving people and realize that it's right to serve anyone such poor meals. I prefer to cook at home, sometimes I just eat cereal but I force myself to eat better!