deadbeat moms? We constantly hear of crackdowns on “dead-beat dads,” but the topic of how they often originate remains hidden and deserves serious light: Dead-beat Mothers.
Motherhood has always been played off as a moral symbol beyond reproach. The truth is it has little moral worth; anyone on I-75 at rush-hour knows there is little risk of the race dying out. Babies are not the final frontier, though that lie certainly helps serve lazy parasites. When choosing to waste her life, her goal is twofold: to have her sustenance assured—to force a man into a position where he must support her—and second, to neatly dispose of her productive years.
There are certain levels of living that no one has the right to affect, including your spouse. First is your purpose in life. Second is the choice of rewards for your own effort, of which she too, is an extension. Trapping a significant other is among the worst malice; arguably worse then rape. Because it’s effects are so long term as it permanently affects so many. Pregnancy in this case is a grasping attempt to take your living energy and spend it on her own bumbling course of destruction: if she is willing to derail your life, she doesn’t care what happens to you and it’s just the beginning—the tip of the iceberg.
To accomplish her fraud, a woman is given a clear outline: created by legislators; funded by tax dollars; and backed up by the government’s monopoly on legal violence. If at any point a man refuses to cooperate men with guns will come to his home and drag him away. A man must finance the endeavor, regardless of how a woman becomes pregnant. When deception has no legal relevance, a serious opportunity exists for fraud to thrive. Here are a few real cases in which this type of insanity manifests it’s self: a middle age teacher statutorily rapes one of her 13 year old students, becomes pregnant, refuses to have an abortion, has a baby, sues him for support and wins. In another, a nurse has sex with a hospital patient, keeps the used condom, inseminates herself in the bathroom, has a baby, sues him for support and wins. Theoretically, a woman could break into a sperm bank, inseminate herself from a dead millionaire, then sue his estate for support and our courts would oblige. There are countless cases of equally asinine yet more conventional deception, which is all predation, period. Such women believe the state of motherhood is beyond moral question, and backed by our courts, is free to commit any atrocity to achieve it. What are our legal guardians thinking? I wouldn’t trust such a Judge to preside over a toaster: fraud is a felony. The legal and moral response to steal money through fraud in any other realm is prison time and restitution, but in this case, the penalties are reserved for the victim.
Couples must plan for the fact that no birth control method is 100% effective, and the choice to have children or not to and when, is not outside the court’s authority to acknowledge. A violation of trust is the basis for any legal suit, and it’s the court’s obligation to determine innocence and reward it as to determine guilt and punish it, or in this case, to grant it nothing.
Still, we hear “If you didn’t want children, you shouldn’t have had sex.” If couples have sex twice a week over the course of a twenty year relationship resulting in two children, sex was had .001% of the time for procreation. The other 99.999% of the time, it was for the sake of the sex. Do we see bikini-clad models and think lustfully of diapers? Does a woman see a gorgeous guy and think of a minivan and a huge rear? SEX IS AN END IN ITSELF. If not, then it is a form of prostitution. Unplanned pregnancy is no longer an irreversible malady hopeless to challenge, and if one partner changes the rules, both lives need not be taken off track. Every new choice our medical advancements offer poses an obligation by those involved to stand by their word, and it’s about time the courts recognized it.
There are enough people on the planet; surely there is room for justice. If men could opt out from the beginning, her pattern would be broken. If she violates her vows as wife or partner, she can face the consequences alone. Like welfare reform, she’d become self-responsible and weigh her choices more carefully. If she refuses abortion on supposedly moral grounds, she’ll have to come to grips with what her principles cost.
Parenting is too important to be handled haphazardly. A both parents should have to right to wait for the conditions he finds conducive to his being a good mate and father—conditions of his fulfillment, safety and honor. It is each person’s responsibility to find a mutually agreeable partner, together to develop a stable environment, and have children when both so intend. Children must be a product of love, trust, mutual respect and sound life progression—not of fraud, contempt and aimlessness.
The world is full of Spirit Murderers who will try to take control of your resourc
Motherhood has always been played off as a moral symbol beyond reproach. The truth is it has little moral worth; anyone on I-75 at rush-hour knows there is little risk of the race dying out. Babies are not the final frontier, though that lie certainly helps serve lazy parasites. When choosing to waste her life, her goal is twofold: to have her sustenance assured—to force a man into a position where he must support her—and second, to neatly dispose of her productive years.
There are certain levels of living that no one has the right to affect, including your spouse. First is your purpose in life. Second is the choice of rewards for your own effort, of which she too, is an extension. Trapping a significant other is among the worst malice; arguably worse then rape. Because it’s effects are so long term as it permanently affects so many. Pregnancy in this case is a grasping attempt to take your living energy and spend it on her own bumbling course of destruction: if she is willing to derail your life, she doesn’t care what happens to you and it’s just the beginning—the tip of the iceberg.
To accomplish her fraud, a woman is given a clear outline: created by legislators; funded by tax dollars; and backed up by the government’s monopoly on legal violence. If at any point a man refuses to cooperate men with guns will come to his home and drag him away. A man must finance the endeavor, regardless of how a woman becomes pregnant. When deception has no legal relevance, a serious opportunity exists for fraud to thrive. Here are a few real cases in which this type of insanity manifests it’s self: a middle age teacher statutorily rapes one of her 13 year old students, becomes pregnant, refuses to have an abortion, has a baby, sues him for support and wins. In another, a nurse has sex with a hospital patient, keeps the used condom, inseminates herself in the bathroom, has a baby, sues him for support and wins. Theoretically, a woman could break into a sperm bank, inseminate herself from a dead millionaire, then sue his estate for support and our courts would oblige. There are countless cases of equally asinine yet more conventional deception, which is all predation, period. Such women believe the state of motherhood is beyond moral question, and backed by our courts, is free to commit any atrocity to achieve it. What are our legal guardians thinking? I wouldn’t trust such a Judge to preside over a toaster: fraud is a felony. The legal and moral response to steal money through fraud in any other realm is prison time and restitution, but in this case, the penalties are reserved for the victim.
Couples must plan for the fact that no birth control method is 100% effective, and the choice to have children or not to and when, is not outside the court’s authority to acknowledge. A violation of trust is the basis for any legal suit, and it’s the court’s obligation to determine innocence and reward it as to determine guilt and punish it, or in this case, to grant it nothing.
Still, we hear “If you didn’t want children, you shouldn’t have had sex.” If couples have sex twice a week over the course of a twenty year relationship resulting in two children, sex was had .001% of the time for procreation. The other 99.999% of the time, it was for the sake of the sex. Do we see bikini-clad models and think lustfully of diapers? Does a woman see a gorgeous guy and think of a minivan and a huge rear? SEX IS AN END IN ITSELF. If not, then it is a form of prostitution. Unplanned pregnancy is no longer an irreversible malady hopeless to challenge, and if one partner changes the rules, both lives need not be taken off track. Every new choice our medical advancements offer poses an obligation by those involved to stand by their word, and it’s about time the courts recognized it.
There are enough people on the planet; surely there is room for justice. If men could opt out from the beginning, her pattern would be broken. If she violates her vows as wife or partner, she can face the consequences alone. Like welfare reform, she’d become self-responsible and weigh her choices more carefully. If she refuses abortion on supposedly moral grounds, she’ll have to come to grips with what her principles cost.
Parenting is too important to be handled haphazardly. A both parents should have to right to wait for the conditions he finds conducive to his being a good mate and father—conditions of his fulfillment, safety and honor. It is each person’s responsibility to find a mutually agreeable partner, together to develop a stable environment, and have children when both so intend. Children must be a product of love, trust, mutual respect and sound life progression—not of fraud, contempt and aimlessness.
The world is full of Spirit Murderers who will try to take control of your resourc
