which tracker could be recommended as best for classical music then?
- Thread starter گیلک
- Start date
HAHA! randomness
New member
I find Demonoid to be the best for classical music. They have the largest collection, with many new torrents uploaded daily and it's very easy to seed there.
Leon_cloud8
New member
From my experience and since you said you're a member of W.cD & W.Fm, I can't think of any tracker that is better than both. But I Personally built and still building my classical Collection from DDl forums - rapidshare, megaupload etc and Ftps -Humongous Collections- The reason because whenever I cross check certain albums ( not the popular ones )on both sites, the seeders are usually very low between 0-2 most of the time, hence My defection away from both.
what.cd seems to be the best one for classical music but i'd suggest you to try LzTr, a recent tracker dedicated to soundtracks/classical/jazz/blues music.
513 classical torrents have been uploaded so far and the tracker is growing day by day.
if you're interested to get invited there, pm me your what.cd profile link with your email.
513 classical torrents have been uploaded so far and the tracker is growing day by day.
if you're interested to get invited there, pm me your what.cd profile link with your email.
~~go with the flow~~
New member
Happens I am a lossless clasical music ripper at Pedro's (and generally on lossless torrent scene) and can tell, you won't find a better place for this kind of music. All rips at BTMusic are high quality(perfect, lossless), rare, and usually with artwork. almost 2000 torrents within the classical genre.
LzTr is kinda small classical music tracker but they really don't know too much about it. To make my point, I uploaded my rip of a rare renaisance classical music at LzTr and it was a hit that everyone was like shocked about while at Pedro's such uploads are just normal.
Plus, listening to classical at @196 or even higher qualities different than lossless is for me pure savage and barbarism
LzTr is kinda small classical music tracker but they really don't know too much about it. To make my point, I uploaded my rip of a rare renaisance classical music at LzTr and it was a hit that everyone was like shocked about while at Pedro's such uploads are just normal.
Plus, listening to classical at @196 or even higher qualities different than lossless is for me pure savage and barbarism
finaldontasy
New member
many thanks for your sincere reply, good luck.
gee,...what a policy then...they say I am not qualified to pm anyone in this forum due to 30 days must-wait period since I registered to this site.
so, I can't pm you even though I have an interest in LzTr you suggested. anyway having a decent ratio/upload at WHAT CD, I might be power user qualified to invite someone sooner or later.
as soon as pm-restriction on me at this site is lifted, I would gladly pm you. you can check my profile on this anyway.
many thanks for spending your time on me.
gee,...what a policy then...they say I am not qualified to pm anyone in this forum due to 30 days must-wait period since I registered to this site.
so, I can't pm you even though I have an interest in LzTr you suggested. anyway having a decent ratio/upload at WHAT CD, I might be power user qualified to invite someone sooner or later.
as soon as pm-restriction on me at this site is lifted, I would gladly pm you. you can check my profile on this anyway.
many thanks for spending your time on me.
x_fluffernutter_x
New member
i can't agree on this one.
ok btmusic has a nice selection including some less known composers but the major part of the 1469 torrents are the most famous works from the major figures of classical music (Beethoven, Mozart, Bach, Brahms, Vivaldi, Wagner, Liszt etc...) while what.cd offers more than 7780 torrents in the same category. don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that btmusic has only the best-known works from crappy record labels but my point is that what.cd has clearly a larger variety of classical torrents.
unless you have an excellent hi-fi equipment and the musical ear, you won't feel any difference between a mp3@320 (even a good v0) and a flac...
ok btmusic has a nice selection including some less known composers but the major part of the 1469 torrents are the most famous works from the major figures of classical music (Beethoven, Mozart, Bach, Brahms, Vivaldi, Wagner, Liszt etc...) while what.cd offers more than 7780 torrents in the same category. don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that btmusic has only the best-known works from crappy record labels but my point is that what.cd has clearly a larger variety of classical torrents.
LzTr is still a recent tracker and they don't have much classical torrents at the moment so i don't see anything wrong in being 'amazed' by a good addition..
obviously, you don't know what you're saying..Plus, listening to classical at @196 or even higher qualities different than lossless is for me pure savage and barbarism
unless you have an excellent hi-fi equipment and the musical ear, you won't feel any difference between a mp3@320 (even a good v0) and a flac...
Morning Beauty
New member
As cine suggested LzTr is great for classical music. Atm not much classical music there, but the owner of the site is known to have a huge collection of classical music...
xxLostxxSoulxx
New member
contact me on the email address you can find in my profilegee,...what a policy then...they say I am not qualified to pm anyone in this forum due to 30 days must-wait period since I registered to this site.
so, I can't pm you even though I have an interest in LzTr you suggested. anyway having a decent ratio/upload at WHAT CD, I might be power user qualified to invite someone sooner or later.
as soon as pm-restriction on me at this site is lifted, I would gladly pm you. you can check my profile on this anyway.
many thanks for spending your time on me.
Pickle_Bound
New member
Demonoid is certainly another great resource for classical as said above. Obviously one has to use different sources to find everything. I tend to use a few different sites to fullfill my classical needs. Pedro's is just one resource, and best for me when I intend to put the music on a CD. Most of the time I use What or Waffles as they do indeed have more albums available.
I'll be checking out LzTr later on, as cine has convinced me that it's worth looking into.
I'll be checking out LzTr later on, as cine has convinced me that it's worth looking into.
contact me on the email address you can find in my profile
I just sent my email to you, please check for me.
you know, cause I have never heard of that LzTr particularly. I would like to try that. many thanks for your tips.
i can't agree on this one.
ok btmusic has a nice selection including some less known composers but the major part of the 1469 torrents are the most famous works from the major figures of classical music (Beethoven, Mozart, Bach, Brahms, Vivaldi, Wagner, Liszt etc...) while what.cd offers more than 7780 torrents in the same category. don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that btmusic has only the best-known works from crappy record labels but my point is that what.cd has clearly a larger variety of classical torrents.
LzTr is still a recent tracker and they don't have much classical torrents at the moment so i don't see anything wrong in being 'amazed' by a good addition..
obviously, you don't know what you're saying..Plus, listening to classical at @196 or even higher qualities different than lossless is for me pure savage and barbarism
unless you have an excellent hi-fi equipment and the musical ear, you won't feel any difference between a mp3@320 (even a good v0) and a flac...
I'm not considering amount of torrents while making this judgment but rather I consider the ratio between quality (which in terms of classical music is crucial) and amount - and if we allow this kind of judgment Pedro's is #1. You obviously don't listen too much to classical music. If you ripped more than 5 classical CD's you would notice something that is known as the "peak level" (which is more or less loudness) -it's very low in classical music comparing to other modern pieces. Therefore listening to this kind of tracks at low quality other than FLAC is really "hardcore". Listen to FLAC for 1-2 years and go back to 192+ and you will know what I'm talking about. And despite all the things people tend to say about hi-tech equipement, these differences are noticable using the crappiest headphones for 5$ - especially if we are talking about classical. (or any type of music that uses harmonic/melodic sounds created by keyboard/string instruments). In other words, you happen to make slight mistake by saying that I am lacking the knowledge in this topic.
So if you tend to care about quality of music, go with Pedro's and it will be the best choice you will ever made. Trust me you will find there everything you need.
This sounds very interesting. Didn't know for that one. Tnx
trouble_double
New member
Cinephilia: wrote you at the potentially fake address listed in your profile as per your prior post in this thread. What's required of those interested in obtaining LzTr invites?