Which Is More Reliable? 2004 Saab 9-3 or 2004 Honda Accord?

[V-Tec]

Out of the two, I would get the Saab. The accord has way too much mileage.

 

[Brian]

Honda is a good reliable brand. Go with the Honda

 

[Abe]

I know that both the 9-3 and Accord had a lot more issues during the 2003 model year because of model redesigns. I'm hoping that by 2004 the Accord's transmission problems and the 9-3's soft wear problems were worked out. This is what I'm looking at:

2004 Honda Accord LX 4-Door, 4-Cyl, 5-spd, 131k miles for $6495


2004 Saab 9-3 Linear 4-Cyl, 5-spd, 97k miles for $6999.

I need a reliable, long lasting car thats good in snow and is also safe. So which would be better?

 

[bbt91945]

The Honda Accord is a more reliable car than the SAAB. Parts are also easier to get if you have any problem at all. Also consider a Toyota Camry or Corolla. Hope this will help you out.

 

[chuckles]

The Honda is better. Saabs are European cars and European cars have a reputation for being far more expensive to maintain.

 

[chuckles]

The Honda is better. Saabs are European cars and European cars have a reputation for being far more expensive to maintain.

 

[chuckles]

The Honda is better. Saabs are European cars and European cars have a reputation for being far more expensive to maintain.

 

[Patrick]

The Honda Accord. Also, the 4cylinder accord did not really have transmission problems. It was the v6 version that had most the problems.

 

[Patrick]

The Honda Accord. Also, the 4cylinder accord did not really have transmission problems. It was the v6 version that had most the problems.