D
davis
Guest
please dont tell me all the crap i already know. i have a 360. dont tell me about how great bluray is or anything. i know 360 is better all the way. some one give me reasons why the PS3 is better.
A
Avery H
Guest
xbox 360 is better now because it has alot more people online at a time,more games, and cheeper. But the ps3 will be worth it in the long run because of playstation home, BlueRay, and HDMI capibilities. I have both systems so this is not just coming from some playstation fanboy.
A
Avery H
Guest
xbox 360 is better now because it has alot more people online at a time,more games, and cheeper. But the ps3 will be worth it in the long run because of playstation home, BlueRay, and HDMI capibilities. I have both systems so this is not just coming from some playstation fanboy.
K
khuezi
Guest
From a hardware stand point, PS3 is better.
If you compare 360's launch titles vs. PS3 launch, you can tell.
PS3 has the cell (4 times faster than a quad-core but not the fastest processor in the world; impressive none-the-less.)
Xbox 360 has a slightly better GPU compared to the PS3's RSX.
BUT, the PS3's CPU -the cell- is enormously more powerful than the 360's Xenon.
If the developers are talented, they can use the CPU and GPU of the PS3 as one, with incredible results.
PS3 has 7 'cores', 1 reserved for the architecture while the 360 has 3, 1 reserved for the system.
Most games out right now only use a few and not all the cores.
Of course, everyone has their biases and I've seen a bunch of Xbots in real life and they haven't got a clue about the PS3.
So the physics, graphics, sound of the PS3 will make the 360 a run for their money in a few years when the noobs learn how to master the PS3.
PSN is FREE dedicated server.
Xbox is paid p2p (lol?)
I can go on and on but you probably think I'm lying and hate me.
If you compare 360's launch titles vs. PS3 launch, you can tell.
PS3 has the cell (4 times faster than a quad-core but not the fastest processor in the world; impressive none-the-less.)
Xbox 360 has a slightly better GPU compared to the PS3's RSX.
BUT, the PS3's CPU -the cell- is enormously more powerful than the 360's Xenon.
If the developers are talented, they can use the CPU and GPU of the PS3 as one, with incredible results.
PS3 has 7 'cores', 1 reserved for the architecture while the 360 has 3, 1 reserved for the system.
Most games out right now only use a few and not all the cores.
Of course, everyone has their biases and I've seen a bunch of Xbots in real life and they haven't got a clue about the PS3.
So the physics, graphics, sound of the PS3 will make the 360 a run for their money in a few years when the noobs learn how to master the PS3.
PSN is FREE dedicated server.
Xbox is paid p2p (lol?)
I can go on and on but you probably think I'm lying and hate me.
S
shadow
Guest
There both great, but i think ps3 is going to do better this year
since its kinda loosing the console war,sony is going to everything to get on the top again, so the're going to make ps3 better, then everyone would want to buy a ps3.
ps3 has many features and games but no one is buying it since people think its to expensive but they haven't seen the real ps3
since its kinda loosing the console war,sony is going to everything to get on the top again, so the're going to make ps3 better, then everyone would want to buy a ps3.
ps3 has many features and games but no one is buying it since people think its to expensive but they haven't seen the real ps3
F
Fudgenut
Guest
u want reasons why ps3 is better
1.Bluray
2.Grand Turismo
3. Sony has its own unique games that microsoft dont got
4. Ps3 looks awesome (xbox 360 looks better
)
Really, xbox 360 is better cause its got content on xbox live which ps3 lacks........xbox 360 is simple and easy to use....controllers are better
1.Bluray
2.Grand Turismo
3. Sony has its own unique games that microsoft dont got
4. Ps3 looks awesome (xbox 360 looks better
)Really, xbox 360 is better cause its got content on xbox live which ps3 lacks........xbox 360 is simple and easy to use....controllers are better