When kooky atheists ridicule me for not believing scientists, should I...

Richard RIGHT

New member
...believe what they said 20 years ago or? what it was modified to 10 years ago or what ithey say now? Which one should I have believed....and which one should I feel stupid for not believing?
No seriously......Your atheist mom and dad 20 years ago ridiculed my mom for not believing things that science now says isn't true. So should I believe what they said then or what they say now?
Yes, yes, I know.....the "beauty" of science is how FREQUENTLY IT'S WRONG! And atheists BRAG ABOUT IT!
To hear kooky atheists, the great thing with science is that they REGULARLY SEE THAT IT'S FLAT WRONG AND HAS TO BE REVISED!
***If 30 years from now, scientists say macro-evolution never happened, will you apologize to Christians or will you say that's the beauty of science.....you were right back then and you're right now?
 
God IS obviously the greatest scientist - why don't people get that? We are so ignorant we know almost nothing about ourselves or our universe and religion has got NOTHING to do with God, it is purely man-made in order to control the masses - get the MOST into your group and don't let them go - punish questioners. It's all so obvious really.
 
That's the beauty of science. Scientists can correct themselves. There are newer and better instruments for investigation and experiments than there were 20 or 10 years ago. We are always learning new things.

What I think is silly is believing that something someone wrote 1500+ years ago is still valid today, especially when the people who endorse this belief are too close minded to admit when they are wrong.
 
hey,you are using the product of science right now,do you think they are wrong about the theory of electricity?BTW which bits of science did scientists say 20 years ago that are now wrong?which scientists?
 
Back
Top